It
came as a shock that the much vaunted Health Sciences Authority (HSA), whose
laboratories are recognised internationally, had perpetuated an error for 10
months without realising it.
The authority called a press conference on the
matter on Tuesday.
The mistake was caused by a laboratory manager
who misread the concentration of the reagent used for DNA tests. As a result,
he made up a solution 10 times as strong as it should have been.
The solution was for use throughout the year.
This reagent was used to test the DNA samples in more than 400 criminal cases.
Such scientific proof could be used to link a person to a crime or scene of
crime.
At the time the error was discovered, in
August last year, even the scientists were not sure how far-reaching the
consequences could have been.
As a result, more than 30 prosecutors at the
Attorney-General's Chambers spent weeks re-tracing more than 400 cases that
might have been affected. Of these, samples from 87 cases were deemed necessary
for retesting.
This amounts to about 2,000 samples - equal to
about three months of work at the laboratory.
When the error first surfaced on Aug3, there
was fear that the consequences would be far graver than they turned out to be.
Could an innocent person have been punished
for a crime he did not commit? Or could a guilty person have been let off -
just because the DNA test was wrong?
Fortunately, as it turned out, the error
merely resulted in a lower sensitivity of the test - which meant the test could
not pick up DNA profiles from poorer quality samples, such as hair and skin.
This, however, should not excuse the HSA from
taking the lapse very seriously. Correcting the error will be costly in time
and money.
More importantly, HSA has to use this as a
wake-up call to put in even more stringent gate-keeping to prevent a similar
occurrence in the future.
HSA audits its DNA tests to make sure that
they are correctly done. What it did not do was to double-check the solution
used.
This is not required in laboratories anywhere
else in the world either, since the solution is just a basic tool used.
Now, of course, this has changed in Singapore.
Every batch is now tested by an independent laboratory.
To be fair, there is every indication the HSA
has taken the error very much to heart and is now looking at where else its
processes can be further strengthened.
When asked why no test was done on the
solution in the first place, Mr Roy Quek, deputy secretary at the Ministry of
Health (MOH), which oversees the HSA, said: "That's a question we're all
asking ourselves now."
But putting in more stringent checks is just
one of two lessons to be learnt from this incident. The other big lesson from
this regrettable episode is that human errors can and do happen.
This is why systems and processes must be
robust - to prevent such lapses.
When the consequences can be dire, when human
lives and freedom hang in the balance, it is better to have more than fewer
systemic safety nets.
It could have been a real tragedy had someone
been sent to the gallows on the strength of a wrong DNA sequence. But since
human error happens, it is equally important that an organisation and the
people in it have the right attitude on what to do when an error surfaces.
In this case, the mistake was made by the
laboratory manager, said to be a very senior person with 30 years of
experience.
He discovered the mistake when mixing the
solution for a next batch for the following year. Instead of covering up, he
had the courage to report it, in spite of the possibly severe consequences both
to him personally and to the HSA. This is highly commendable.
In fact, I would go so far as to say that this
person's integrity - in the face of possible professional ruin and personal
embarrassment - has done HSA and Singapore proud.
The error was an honest mistake, and if deemed
necessary, he should be punished for it. But it should not overshadow the
significance of his act in reporting the error.
Such behaviour should be lauded and
encouraged.
As noted at the press conference on Tuesday
where representatives of various government bodies, including the Attorney-General's
Chambers and the police, were present, if he had kept quiet, the error would
likely have gone undiscovered.
It took moral courage for the lab manager to
own up to the error, and integrity for HSA to call in all relevant government
agencies to review the import of the mistake and take steps to rectify the
wrong.
This kind of personal and institutional
integrity to admit wrongdoing and take steps to fix a wrong goes a long way to
help the public maintain confidence in the HSA.
Salma Khalik
The Straits Times
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment