What was a small, peaceful strike in a dormitory in Woodlands by a group
of bus drivers has resulted in five charged under the Criminal Law (Temporary
Provisions) Act and 29 repatriated to China as the government demonstrates its
“zero tolerance” for strike action.
On Monday morning 171 drivers
from SMRT (one of Singapore’s two public transport companies) refused to go to
work, assembling outside their dormitory in protest against poor living
conditions and discrepancy in pay for drivers of different nationalities. 88
continued the strike on Tuesday.
While Singaporean drivers are
paid S$1,775 a month, Malaysians are paid S$1,400 and Chinese S$1,075. Both
Singaporeans and Malaysians will receive a month’s bonus at the end of the
year, while Chinese drivers will only receive a month’s bonus after the
completion of their two-year contract. Chinese drivers receive free lodging in
dormitories, but the workers complained of overcrowding and other issues such
as bedbug infestations. An investigation by the Ministry of Manpower found that
the housekeeping in the dormitories were “below par” and that drivers working
different shifts were often roomed together, making it difficult for workers to
get any rest.
This bus strike is the first
major strike in Singapore in over three decades. Previous strikes undertaken by
migrant workers in the construction sector have passed relatively unnoticed,
but this strike involves a public transport company. With public transport
deemed an “essential service” in Singapore, striking is outlawed under the
Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act – also known as the CLTPA – unless 14
days’ notice is given. The Chinese workers had not given any notice.
The strike was roundly condemned
by the establishment: Acting Minister of Manpower Tan Chuan Jin labelled it an
“illegal strike” for which there would be “zero tolerance”. The National Trades
Union Congress (NTUC) agreed, sternly demanding that the workers be dealt with.
The episode was quickly framed as a criminal action perpetuated by a group of
workers who had deprived Singapore of an “essential service”.
Singaporeans also expressed
disapproval of the drivers’ strike, saying that the workers should have
negotiated with the company instead. But how easy is it for workers to seek
redress for their grievances through official processes?
In their press statement migrant
worker NGO Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) stated that “there is a gap
between what is offered on paper as due process and what actually happens”.
Mediation between employer and employee is often tilted in favour of the
employer, and migrant workers face further risks of work permit cancellations
and repatriation without compensation.
This can clearly be seen in the
case of the bus strike: five were singled out and charged under the CLTPA for
participating in an illegal strike, while 29 who were described as “hostile and
aggressive” will be repatriated. This, even though their concerns were
legitimate: there is discrepancy in wages and even the ministry found that
standards needed to be improved in the dormitories. Would these issues really
have been picked up in closed-door negotiations if the workers had not resorted
to industrial action? Or would they have been swept under the carpet?
Labour relations in Singapore
have been dysfunctional for a long time. Instead of independent unions, we have
a tripartite system where unions, employers and the government are more often
than not closely intertwined. In fact, the unions are often seen as taking the
side of the employers and the government, rather than that of the workers.
Without the right to organise and participate in collective action, workers
have essentially lost their most important bargaining chip, exacerbating the
power imbalance between employer and employee.
That practically the entire
machinery of the state had been employed in oppressing the strike is telling of
how things are done in Singapore. In a Facebook status update Tan Chuan Jin
thanked his colleagues in “SPF [Singapore Police Force], MHA [Ministry of Home
Affairs], MOM [Ministry of Manpower], MOT [Ministry of Transport], LTA [Land
Transport Authority], MinLaw [Ministry of Law], ICA [Immigration &
Checkpoints Authority], AGC [Attorney-General's Chambers], MFA [Ministry of
Foreign Affairs] and Prisons who have been working round the clock to manage
this situation.” This, compared to the way the government handled the SMRT
train breakdowns in December 2011 (which probably caused much more of an
interruption to “essential services” than the strike) where LTA went as far as
to say that it shared some of the blame!
With all the emphasis on dealing
with this “illegal strike”, the most crucial questions have been forgotten:
what are the conditions under which the workers have to work? Is it really fair
to pay people differently simply on the basis of nationality? How easy or
difficult is it for workers to seek redress for their grievances? If the
current unions are no longer perceived to be representing the workers, is it
time to review their relevance? Will we ever hear the stories of the workers
branded as “hostile and aggressive” even though the strike was peaceful? Or are
we all just expected to take the ministry’s word for it?
Instead all we’re reminded of is
the stick waved in all our faces: don’t strike. Look at how serious the
consequences are. Look at how we’ll deal with you. Remember, this is Singapore.
Zero tolerance. Amidst all these fierce warnings we sink back into apathy and
inaction, and employers get away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist (if
anything).
Some will think that this episode
only had to do with foreign workers, but the events of the bus strike is so
much more than that. Because if this is how the Singapore system works against
workers, ultimately Singaporeans will suffer too.
Business & Investment Opportunities
Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Health care and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN 's area. We are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, if any request, please, contact directly Dr Christian SIODMAK, business strategist, owner and CEO of SBC at christian.siodmak@gmail.com. Many thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment