Charges and countercharges between the United States and China over cybersecurity have increased in recent times. The US administration and private cybersecurity companies both have blamed China for the rising threat to American cyberspace.
Delivering a speech at the Asia Society in New York on March 11, US National Security Advisor Tom Donilon urged China to "take serious steps to investigate (into) and put a stop" to cyberattacks launched "from within China" against American websites. Donilon also asked China to engage with the US in a constructive direct dialogue to establish acceptable norms of behaviour in cyberspace. "The United States and China, the world's two largest economies, both dependent on the Internet, must lead the way in addressing this problem," he said.
In response, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said during a recent briefing that China is willing to hold constructive dialogue and cooperation with the international community, including the US, on the issue to maintain the security, openness and peace of the Internet. But the dialogue and cooperation should be based on the principle of mutual respect and trust.
Building mutual trust, however, is the responsibility of Beijing and Washington both. This means the US, too, should "take serious steps to investigate (into) and put a stop" to hacking of Chinese sites by people from within the US, and hold dialogue with China to establish acceptable norms of behaviour in cyberspace.
So is the US willing to engage in constructive cooperation in cybersecurity with China on an equal footing?
Cyberattacks against US interests are launched from all over the world, and those that Washington suspects originate in China have not been conducted with government support. The Chinese government has repeatedly said that it has no "cyber army" and has never launched attacks on US networks.
Besides, not all the attacks originating from China are carried out by Chinese nationals. Foreigners, including Americans, could also use China as a base to hack US sites. Nevertheless, the Chinese government should intensify its crackdown on hacking, no matter who are the behind-the-scene players.
But before that, China has to know whether the US has a cyber-army and whether it has launched attacks against Chinese networks. If it has, then it should put its house in order before accusing other countries of hacking.
Chinese laws prohibit hacking. Irrespective of whether it is aimed at Chinese or foreign networks, hacking is a violation of Chinese laws and regulations. People or organisations that orchestrate it deserve punishment according to the law. And suggestions by all countries to work with China to stop the menace of hacking are welcome.
But will the US, if it has launched attacks against Chinese sites, allow the hackers to be prosecuted by China and guarantee that such attacks will not take place in the future? Or, if a non-state entity in the US launches an attack against Chinese networks, will the US administration punish it?
The most important question is what rules and code of conduct should govern cyberspace. Should the rules empower only the US to have a cyber-army, and thus to launch attacks on foreign networks, but deprive other countries of having one, even for self-defence? Should the rules give the US the right to force China to cooperate in investigations into attacks launched against American sites? Or, should they grant all countries the right to have cyber armies and launch cyberattacks, and therefore create mayhem and chaos in cyberspace?
Moreover, will the US clarify up to what extent it will open its cyberspace to let China and the rest of the world know whether it is violating the existing cyber rules?
The US has the most advanced and sophisticated cyber army, and its accusation that China sponsors hackers for cyberattacks is to draw attention away from its doings. The fact is, the US has the most professional hackers at its disposal and China is the biggest victim of their attacks.
The US talks about making cyber rules, but it is clear that it will not accept rules that could undermine its cyberpower. Instead, it wants to establish rules that will force other countries to accept its demands that are aimed at furthering American interests.
Since the US does not want to abide by international law on matters related to China's sovereignty, such as the Taiwan issue and the Diaoyu Islands dispute, it does not have the moral right to urge China to abide by rules that perpetrate American hegemony.
The author is a professor at and vice president of the Institute of International studies, Fudan University.
Business & Investment Opportunities
Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Health care and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN 's area. We are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, if any request, please, contact directly Dr Christian SIODMAK, business strategist, owner and CEO of SBC at email@example.com. Many thanks.