Chinese state media has reacted with fearful
outrage at Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's move to let troops engage in
collective self-defence and called for a response that would make Japan
"feel daunted".
The
decision to re-interpret Japan's pacifist Constitution to allow its troops to
go to the defence of an ally is proof that the Abe administration and its
American backers want to see turmoil in the region, it said.
"Generations
of Japanese right-wing politicians have staged a relay race to amend the
pacifist Constitution," wrote the nationalist Global Times.
"They
proclaimed the right to send soldiers overseas, and now it is the right to
exercise force. Abe has almost fulfilled this task, and the Peace Constitution
will become nothing but a figurehead."
It
added: "It's hard to say how far it will go, but what we need to do is to
be ready in a way that makes Japan feel daunted."
A China
Daily editorial labelled the move as one that opens a "Pandora's box"
in East Asia, referring to the fabled Greek artefact that was said to contain
all the evil in the world.
Last
December, after Abe made a visit to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine, which
commemorates Japan's wartime dead including 14 war criminals, Beijing
coordinated a global public relations campaign where its ambassadors penned
articles in over 40 foreign publications decrying Abe's re-militarisation
agenda.
In
2012, after Japan nationalised the disputed Diaoyu/ Senkaku islands in the East
China Sea, large-scale protests erupted across China and the Chinese government
reportedly held back rare-earth exports to Japan.
But
mainland observers interviewed by The Straits Times yesterday urged the Chinese
government to take a wait-and-see approach this time and avoid over- reacting
to the re-interpretation, approved by the Japanese Cabinet on Tuesday.
It is
now expected to be passed by the Japanese Parliament in which Abe's coalition
controls the majority of seats.
There
is widespread opposition to the move, both internationally and within Japan,
said mainland analysts.
China
should recognise and encourage this organic opposition rather than harden
bilateral relations, they argued.
"Of
course, China is worried. This change allows Japan to fire the first shot,
which it said it would not do again after World War II," said Fudan
University Sino-Japan expert Feng Wei.
"But
we should not let fiery, nationalistic rhetoric and actions dominate China's
response, as this overlooks the fact that surveys show that a big portion of
Japanese oppose (the change)."
China
must also continue to stress to the international community its desire for
peaceful development to gain support, he said.
Chinese
foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei said on Tuesday that "people cannot
but question whether Japan is deviating from the path of peaceful development
that it has been upholding since the end of World War II".
He
urged Japan to "respect the legitimate security concerns of its Asian
neighbours" but made clear that the Japanese public has the final say.
"During
this whole process of approving the re-interpretation, the Japanese government
has never mentioned China although everyone knows that China's rise is a big
factor," said Prof Lian Degui from the Shanghai Institutes for
International Studies.
"But
there are also other factors such as Japan wanting to be a 'normal' country.
Since nothing is as yet pointed at China, China need not do anything."
Rachel
Chang
Business & Investment Opportunities
Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated
in Singapore since 1994.
No comments:
Post a Comment