OSAKA — First
in a six-part series about major sources of renewable energy in Japan and the
prospects for their future use and development
The disaster at the Fukushima No. 1 power plant has not only
demolished the myth that atomic power is safe, it's sparked an unprecedented
nationwide debate on the merits of abandoning it for renewable energy sources.
The debate centres around one fundamental question: Is it
better to continue to rely on nuclear power or is it time to embrace renewable
energies like solar, geothermal, wind, hydro and biomass? Whichever side wins
will determine the nature of Japan's energy mix — and its economy — for decades
to come.
At the moment, political attention and public sympathy
appears to lie with renewable energies. Former Prime Minister Naoto Kan told
the world in May Japan would generate 20 percent of its electricity from
renewable energy sources by the 2020s.
As of 2009, Japan was only generating about 9 percent of its
electricity from renewable energy sources. That figure drops to about 1.1
percent if you take away hydropower.
But new Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda has said he still sees
some sort of future for nuclear power, raising questions about how committed he
may be to supporting a shift to renewable energy.
A law coming into force in July 2012 requires utilities to
buy power generated by renewable sources. Its goal is to generate 30,000
megawatts of electricity by 2022, mostly through increased use of wind, solar,
geothermal, and mini-hydro and biomass. Those three energies currently produce
about 6,500 megawatts of power.
The law includes a feed-in tariff provision over a set time
period to make renewables more competitive with fossil fuels. Deciding a
purchase price, as well as a time period, is now the responsibility of Noda's
government. While reports in early September suggested the final tariff may
range between ¥20 and ¥40 per kilowatt-hour, the matter is still being
discussed.
Yet shutting down even some of Japan's 54 commercial
reactors, which provide an average of 30 percent of the nation's electricity,
and replacing them with renewable energy is a controversial idea that has
excited many and terrified others, especially those in the so-called nuclear
village of pronuclear power politicians, bureaucrats, utility executives,
academics and media.
While recent media polls show that up to 70 percent of the
public favors at least gradually phasing out nuclear power, its defenders would
rather fight than switch. They're asking if Japan can afford, in both an
economic and basic survival sense, to leave nuclear power behind.
Any discussion on electric power generation in Japan begins,
and often ends, with three words: safe, secure and stable. They have long been
a mantra, especially among proponents of coal, oil, gas and nuclear power,
uttered when the suggestion of shifting from traditional to renewable energy
sources is raised.
In the case of pronuclear utilities, businesses, government
officials, academics and media assert that because Japan has to import about 96
percent of its energy, it's imperative that a long-term energy policy consist
of the right energy mix, one that is cost effective as well as safe, secure and
stable.
The government claims nuclear power is only ¥5 to ¥6 per
kilowatt-hour, compared with ¥49/kwh for solar, ¥10 to ¥14/kwh for large wind
farms, and ¥8 to ¥13/kwh for hydro plants.
But renewable energy advocates note calculations by the
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry for nuclear power do not include waste
disposal or liability costs in accidents — costs that the customer ultimately
has to bear.
Tetsunari Iida, of the Institute for Sustainable Energy
Policies, estimates that if these costs are included, the real cost of nuclear
power rises to as high as ¥15/kwh.
In addition, the cost of some renewable energies, especially
solar, has declined worldwide in recent years thanks to innovations in
technology. Given that Japan is now debating what kind of energy it will be
using by midcentury, nuclear power critics ask, is it really wise to assume the
price for renewable energies will be higher than nuclear in 2020 or 2030, let
alone 2050?
Over the past six months, much of the energy debate has
focused on pronuclear METI's role. At a meeting of renewable-energy experts in
June, Kan acknowledged that, although he had instructed METI to work hard to
get the renewable energy bill passed, their actions had been slow.
"METI has long been negative about renewable energy in
general as well as the feed-in tariff in particular. The ministry adopted (a
2010 solar energy) feed-in tariff not with the objective of diffusing renewable
energy as much as possible, but, rather, with the objective of stalling
progress as much as possible," wrote Andrew DeWit and Iida, in a 2011
report, "The 'Power Elite' and Environmental Energy Policy in Japan."
Since the quake, however, a growing number of private
businesses and local governments aren't waiting on politicians and bureaucrats
but forging ahead with plans to create a postnuclear power nation.
Softbank founder Masayoshi Son captured domestic, and
international, media attention by asking whether Japan can afford not to invest
in renewables. He has promised billions of yen from Softbank over the coming
years for that purpose.
"By building megasolar farms throughout Japan on unused
land, rooftops and elsewhere, it will be possible to generate an additional 100
million kilowatts of power," Son said in April when he announced his plan.
Sensing new economic opportunities and a chance to break the
stranglehold that the quasi-monopolistic utilities have on power generation and
supply, 36 governors have rushed to embrace Son's idea. Their enthusiasm shows
that the actual question may not be whether renewable energies will replace
nuclear power in the country as a whole, but which parts of Japan will lead the
way in shifting from nuclear and even fossil fuels to renewables.
In particular, Kyushu and parts of the Tohoku region are far
better positioned than Tokyo or the Kansai region to become Japan's leaders in
natural electricity. A joint 2010 study by Chiba University's Kurasaka
Environmental Research Laboratory and ISEP, based on 2009 figures, showed seven
prefectures had higher self-sufficiency rates for renewable-energy electricity
generation than the national average of 9 percent.
In addition, some 57 cities, towns and villages in Japan have
100 percent of their electricity supplied by renewables, including 10
municipalities in Nagano Prefecture.
"It's clear some regions of Japan have great potential
for developing local natural resources that they could rely on for most, if not
all, of their electricity needs. With adequate central and local government
support, they could greatly reduce their need for fossil fuel or nuclear
power," said Yoshiaki Koike, president of the Kuju Kanko Hotel in Oita
Prefecture, which generates its own electricity from a small geothermal plant.
Yet, those involved with renewable and natural energies also
point out it is not just price and availability that will determine Japan's
renewable energy future. Due to opposition from utility companies and their
political and bureaucratic allies, smart-grid systems have been slow to take
off.
Introducing smart-grid technologies would, proponents say,
create an incentive for renewable energy resources to become more prevalent,
and would eventually reduce the overall cost of electricity.
However, the toughest challenge is not likely to be
technological. Japanese firms in solar and geothermal technology are already
world leaders, and many others are promoting smart-grid systems abroad. Nor is
it likely to be financial. Despite the higher cost of some renewables,
worldwide investment and research and technology development trends clearly
favor renewable energies like solar, wind, and hydro over nuclear.
The real barrier appears to be political. Japan's nuclear
power village remains influential among politicians and bureaucrats, despite
broad public concern about nuclear power. Towns in rural prefectures with
abundant natural energy resources and small businesses may be able to get
political support to cut back on nuclear power and switch to renewable energies
fairly easily. But urban-based large pronuclear industries and the utilities
themselves remain politically influential and wary of renewable energies.
"We know the LDP has received huge amounts of money from
the utilities over the years, and that the DPJ has been supported by the
utilities' labor union. So, both parties are under the strong influence of the
power companies," Liberal Democratic Party member Taro Kono, long a critic
of his own party's embrace of nuclear power, told journalists in August.
Meanwhile, those living in cities like Tokyo, Nagoya and
Osaka heavily rely on nuclear power as a cheap, plentiful energy source. Their
views are likely to have a great, and possibly decisive, impact on the
direction of Japan's energy policy.
Kono said that the pronuclear members of the Diet are simply
waiting for the media hoopla over nonnuclear energies to recede.
"A lot of LDP members think the public will probably
forget (about serious alternatives to nuclear power) in three to five years,
and then we'll start building nuclear reactors again," he said.
For the moment, though, the potentials offered by renewable
energies are very much on the minds of the public, businessmen like Son and
some politicians. Each energy source presents its own advantages and
challenges, but each is likely to play a key role in Japan's renewable energy
future, regardless of what happens to its nuclear power plants.
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment