It
comes at a time when Singaporeans are clamouring for a greater degree of
personal liberties and liberal democracy in a city where bonds are being
diluted by mass foreign arrivals.
In the eyes of the government, they require a
new effort to reinforce national and individual values, particularly in
politics, which had guided the city for the past 46 years.
On Wednesday, the government announced a
record-high population of 5.18 million, of which 37 per cent came from abroad.
This was another growth of 2.1 per cent in the past six months.
The continuing influx has raised resentment
among Singaporeans and the government has organised community programmes to
integrate the different communities.
Education minister Heng Swee Kiat’s concern is
not only in dealing with larger numbers of students or improving academic
quality, but also ensuring that youths respond rationally.
From official comments so far, the concept
seems to be two-pronged – one being to mould student behaviour towards others,
particularly foreigners living in their midst.
The 50-year-old minister defined moral values
and responsible behaviour as “respect, responsibility, care and appreciation
towards others”.
The second part – likely to be more
controversial – is to get students to understand politics a la Singapore.
He told a recent seminar that political values
would be included such as responsibilities of citizenship.
“As a young nation with a short history of
independence, we must have informed, rugged and resilient citizens.”
When the students graduate, he said “they
would stay united to overcome crises and adversities which we must expect to
happen from time to time”.
Heng, one-time principal private secretary to
former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, became education minister after his
election in May and is believed to be earmarked for a higher leadership role.
His plan is not entirely new. Last year, the
education ministry had set up a Citizenship Education Unit with a view to
crafting “active citizens”.
“We may live on a small island but, unlike
Robinson Crusoe, we do not live alone,” he told the gathering.
The new focus would get youths to be less
self-centred, “to look beyond themselves and start to appreciate people whom
they come into contact with regularly but seldom notice”.
His “citizenship” policy appears to differ
with the stand of law minister K. Shanmugam, who described Singapore in a
speech as “not a country, but a city”.
Heng not only thinks otherwise, but wants to
implant the idea of citizenship deeply in the student mind.
The new objective is not only to develop the
student academically, but also to get him to think of his own responsibilities
in the wider society.
The public reaction to the plan is likely to
be mixed, with many parents supporting moral and character training.
By nature, Singaporeans are generally
conservative and stick to tradition – particularly the older folk.
“The teaching of social behaviour and values
is a long time coming,” said a retired civil servant.
“The youths here are generally quick-learning
and hardworking but a bit too self-centred to live in a global city,” he added.
“A ‘values-based’ education should balance things.”
However, the idea of political teaching may
not go down too well with many people in the wake of the May election in which
40 per cent of people voted against the ruling party.
To some, it stirs suspicions of “political
brainwashing” of young minds.
When the idea was first mooted last year,
leaders of the People’s Action Party (PAP) had expressed concern that
Singaporeans were becoming too influenced by “Western-type democracy”.
Ever since the election, Lee Kuan Yew has
condemned the principle of a two-party political system as detrimental for
Singapore.
His son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, is a
few shades less hard-hitting than him and has pledged to implement reforms
gradually.
In a talk to foreign correspondents in 2005,
PM Lee said: “I think in 20 years our society will change. I think the politics
of it will change. But I do not see a Western model ... as the target we want
to aim for.”
Critics fear that the political programme
would be used “to clean youthful minds” so that the ruling party can remain in
power.
“The classroom can easily be turned into an
arena for political campaigning on behalf of the ruling party behind the veneer
of providing an all-rounded curriculum,” said Ng E-jay in his online feedback.
“This is crossing the line. Politics should
stay out of the classroom,” commented surfer gil.
Will it work?
Some teachers believe it is a lot easier to
teach social values and individual behaviour than it is implanting political
values in an individual.
It will even be tougher to make the learning
stick as he grows into an adult.
“Students are not stupid these days. Unlike us
30 years ago, these kids are well informed, having access to the Internet,”
said acacia. He said he would be surprised if they took such lessons seriously.
The average student today generally pays
little interest to politics, and such a programme might completely turn him off
the lectures, said a polytechnic student.
Or, he added, it could be a disaster for the
PAP. “Instead of supporting the ruling party, they could well rotate to the
opposition parties,” he said.
Besides, such value teaching can badly
backfire if the political leaders and teachers do not follow the “right values”
that they want students to learn.
Seah Chiang Nee
The Star
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment