The latest crisis in Singapore is public transport, which
has been getting intolerably overcrowded in recent years. It has joined a few
other over-burdened services like public housing and healthcare facilities.
SINGAPORE’S public transport
system has become the latest thing to feel the weight of rapid population
expansion.
For years debate has raged
without conclusion whether Singapore can accommodate six-and-a-half million
people or even more.
Well, with the population
reaching 5.18 million many Singaporeans are now convinced they have the answer,
and it’s not what the government likes to hear.
The people explosion in the
past decade has strained public services on the island – one of the most
densest-populated in the world – to breaking point.
Singapore’s infrastructure –
painstakingly built and maintained – is still in fairly working order compared
to many countries, but it has lost much of its previous lustre.
The latest crisis is public
transport, which has been getting intolerably overcrowded in recent years. It
has joined a few other over-burdened services like public housing and
healthcare facilities.
Last year, there were more
shortage cases of make-do hospital beds along corridors, and fresh graduates
unable to buy public houses and delaying marriages.
A new one now has emerged –
trains and buses.
Built 24 years ago when the
population was half the size, Singapore’s Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) broke down
last week on a daily basis, stranding more than 200,000 passengers.
For the first time Singaporeans
were finding out that their “world-class” transport system was starting to
malfunction.
The MRT breakdown was
“extremely serious”, exclaimed Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew.
Many Singaporeans are demanding
that SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa resign to take responsibility. A petition attracted
1,400 signatures.
After saying she might do just
that, Saw later changed her mind and now says she will stay.
The failures caused widespread
public misery. Stories abound of businessmen missing deals and appointments and
workers having part of their wages docked for coming late.
A government backbencher said
she had received numerous appeals for help from affected commuters.
“Some workers made it home
around midnight,” she said.
The rail dilemma recalled Prime
Minister Lee Hsien Loong from a two-week leave to announce he was ordering a
national inquiry.
The demand for public transport
spilled into jammed buses, where fleet expansion had already resulted in the
hiring of poorly-trained foreign drivers unfamiliar with the roads.
Like a comedy of errors,
several drivers found themselves driving around in circles before reporting
being lost.
In one case travellers were
kept in the vehicle for hours as the driver, probably from China, drove around
trying to find the right way.
The train inquiry will throw up
some questions. Minister Liu noted that train frequencies over the years to
cater to a growing population had resulted in less time to carry out
inspections and maintenance.
“We are getting away lightly.
Things could have been much worse. It is lucky we have avoided a train crash,”
said a commuter.
Many critics blame the
government for running public services (including transport and public housing)
like a business where keeping costs down and profits up is top priority.
The transport fiasco will
continue to have an impact on politics in the years ahead until the next
election. It will affect all Singaporeans, but one group above all – senior
citizens.
The Straits Times published a
survey last week which said Singaporeans were most dissatisfied with the public
transport system and disliked the poor punctuality.
The survey, done before the
recent breakdowns, said four out of 10 in this group were seniors above 60
years old, of which 41% were very dissatisfied.
The feelings are
understandable. They already live in one of Asia’s most expensive retirement
cities, and the government policy is to make it costly to operate a car.
I have often heard people talk
of Singapore being a small island.
Well, it may be to the young
and mobile – but for a 71-year-old like me whose health had known better days,
Singapore is definitely not small.
And moving around becomes
harder. Last week particularly was a nightmare.
Two years ago when I downgraded
to a smaller home I was guided by one thought – how to avoid being squeezed by
the government’s future transport strategy.
It looked obvious to me the
policy was to make car ownership impossibly expensive to contemplate. So I
searched everywhere for a home that was within 10 minutes walk from a train
station.
That was easier said than done.
It seemed everyone had the same idea and costs were going up.
To me, depending on public
transport was not an option but a necessity.
I was preparing for the
inevitable day when I would have to surrender my old four-wheeler to the
junkyard because of rising operating costs.
At the moment, the
Singaporean’s love affair with the car remains strong, but I believe the
authorities will invent tougher fiscal measures to pry the car away from him.
Some will, of course, rather
kiss Singapore goodbye than their vehicle.
One devilish way on the card is
the replacement of the Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) system, where cars passing
through certain gantry points are automatically charged a fee.
In its place, the authorities
will introduce the Global Positioning System (GPS) to satellite-track vehicles
on Singapore roads for tax purposes.
When that day arrives, the
moment you drive your car out of your front gate, the government taxman takes
over – unseen and efficient.
That will probably happen
within the next two years. By then few Singaporeans can afford to keep their
cars or abandon the train or bus.
This is why the Transport
Minister has the good wishes of every commuter in Singapore to repair public
transport on time.
SEAH CHIANG NEE
The Star
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment