An obscure report from
researchers in India appeared online late last year and sent a shiver through
the medical community. In the weeks since then, the report has come under close
scrutiny.
As well it should, since it suggests we could lose a century of
progress and find ourselves dying in the millions from tuberculosis, just like
our 19th-century ancestors.
According to the original report, published Dec. 21 in Clinical
Infectious Diseases, a hospital in Mumbai, India had identified 12 TB patients
whose disease resisted all antibiotics. Nothing worked with them. All the
patients appeared to have strains of TB known as multi-drug resistant (MDR-TB)
and extremely drug resistant (XDR-TB).
They had been given antibiotics, but had not completed their course of
treatment. Or they had been given the wrong antibiotics altogether, a common
experience worldwide. Anything that doesn't kill the TB bacillus makes it
stronger, and the doctors at PD Hinduja Hospital found nothing that could kill
these patients' TB. As an Indian news report began, "This is as scary as
it can get."
Scary, but not surprising. Ever since the advent of sulfa drugs and
penicillin, we have been locked in an arms race with bacteria. Antibiotics
originally had wonderfully lethal effects on many infections. But in some cases
a few bacteria had genetic resistance to a given drug, or the treatment wasn't
long or intense enough. Either way, the survivors learned to best such drugs. We
came up with new drugs, and again they worked -- until a few bacteria survived
and multiplied.
The age of superbugs
This is why we now have "superbugs" like MRSA
(multiple-drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and C. difficile, which spread
easily in hospitals. In 2005, 94,000 Americans contracted MRSA and 18,650 died
from it -- more than died from AIDS. In Canada, an estimated 220,000
hospital-acquired infections result in at least 8,000 deaths a year.
According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, drug-resistant TB is
not yet a problem here. But out of 18,000 cases studied between 1998 and 2010,
210 (1.2 per cent) were multi-drug-resistant and five (0.03 per cent) were
extremely drug-resistant.
So the report of a totally drug-resistant tuberculosis in India was not
welcomed, in India or anywhere else. An Indian paper added to public worries by
reporting in mid- January that out of 100 randomly selected TB patients in
Bangalore -- almost 1,000 kilometres from Mumbai -- six were carrying the
"TDR" strain.
Impossible to contain
A quick search on Google Scholar shows that the 12 Mumbai patients were
not the first. In 2006, an Iranian team in Tehran had identified 15 TDR-TB
cases in patients who included immigrants from Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, and
Iraq. And two women in Italy had died in 2003 after years of unsuccessful
treatment with all available drugs.
This untreatable TB strain, in other words, has been around for over a
decade, and it has now turned up from Italy to Mumbai. It seems unlikely that
we will be able to contain it. We can expect to find it in more places, if only
because we'll now be looking for it.
The implication of TDR-TB is of course a rollback to the 19th century,
when "consumption" was a major cause of death around the world. It is
still a threat to poor people; the World Health Organization says that
"one-third of the world's population is currently infected with the TB
bacillus." WHO also estimates that 1.7 million people, mostly Africans,
died of TB in 2009 -- 4,657 deaths every day of the year.
So the prospect of untreatable TB is a disturbing one. WHO notes that
in the Americas, only 2.1 persons per 100,000 die of TB. With a totally
drug-resistant strain, that rate could easily exceed Africa's current rate of
50 deaths per 100,000.
Not everyone accepts the Mumbai findings. The British medical journal
The Lancet has reported on them without objections. But WHO has published an
FAQ that takes issue with the whole idea: "the term 'totally drug
resistant' tuberculosis is not yet recognised by the WHO. For now these cases
are extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), according to WHO
definitions."
Indian health authorities have been quick to support WHO. The Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare also dismissed the Mumbai cases as XDR-TB (which
itself was appalling when WHO first defined it in 2006).
Grounds for caution
Both institutions have reason to be politically cautious. WHO was
sharply criticized in 2009 when it declared the H1N1 flu to be a
"pandemic," though very few people died from it.
India actively promotes medical tourism, inviting westerners to take
advantage of cheap surgery. When the super-resistant NDM-1 enzyme was
identified last year in India, the government and medical experts protested
that it was just a plot to hurt the medical tourism industry. Their effort at
damage control backfired, so WHO's skepticism about TDR-TB was welcome.
This new strain of TB may yet succumb to some antibiotic we'll discover
before long. But even if we do succeed in controlling it, our victory will be
short-lived. TB and a host of other diseases will always mutate one step ahead
of us. Until we remove their root causes -- poverty, malnutrition, poor
sanitation, ignorance -- we will remain both their victims and their allies.
Crawford Kilian
The Tyee
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment