Thailand would be better prepared for another disastrous
flood if management tools were modified and public participation in water
management broadly enhanced, panellists said at a recent seminar.
Participants at a roundtable
discussion hosted by Krungthep Turakij titled "Flood lesson: Water
management", agreed that existing management tools were limited and aimed
mainly at agricultural irrigation. All parties should share responsibility for
water management, they said, to increase efficiency and reduce the burden on
the government.
"There are many complete
water-management plans. The government committees should look into them and
change some to fit the new environment and clarify stakeholders' duties and
rights," said Assoc Prof Chaiyuth Sukhsri, of Chulalongkorn University's
Faculty of Engineering.
"Prioritisation of actions
is vital, as it will suggest the cost involved. Inclusive participation is also
vital, as all are affected," he said. "To limit the burden on the
government, all parties should be informed of the conditions in their living
areas and learn how to adapt their lifestyles accordingly."
Chaiyuth said if all parties
had a say in water-management plans, which would involve sacrificing some land
to construct a floodway, the loss burden would be fairly distributed.
He blamed poor communication
for excessive damage in the recent floods, as poorly informed people had had to
build barriers to protect themselves, which in turn blocked the overall
drainage of water. And, despite political decentralisation, some local
officials failed to take care of irrigation in their areas and left all
responsibility to the central government.
Thongplew Kongjun, director of
the Royal Irrigation Department's Hydrology Division, said that in engineering
terms, anything was possible - building dams or investing in infrastructure to
store and discharge water.
"However, social
resistance and environmental concerns could pose major limitations," he
said.
The panellists urged the
government committee in charge of drawing up the water-management plan, led by
Chaipattana Foundation secretary-general Sumet Tantivejkul, to look into
regulations that pose obstacles to water management. For example, the irrigation
system cannot pass through national forests, while the Royal Irrigation
Department could be liable to lawsuits if it channelled water into
non-agricultural areas. And enforcement of regulations must be tough concerning
buildings that block floodways, they said.
"The existing tools are
insufficient, and management of the existing infrastructure is difficult, due
to the changing environmental conditions," Thongplew said.
Amid questions on whether
floods of the scale seen last year would return this year, the panellists said
it was better to ask how to cope with floods.
Thongplew said the current
water-management system dealt mainly with water in dams and in rivers, while
flash floods remain uncontrolled.
Thailand has 33 big dams and
367 medium-sized dams, controlled by the "U-curve" theory, according
to which water is not allowed to exceed the upper levels of the U-curve during
the rainy season and is not released below the lower end of the U-curve during
the dry season.
Sluice gates and dykes are used
to control water in rivers. But Thongplew said flash floods were most difficult
to control, and no particular government unit was in charge of this.
In terms of tools, all were
designed for agricultural irrigation, not for disasters. Water was directed from
big channels to narrower channels, which slowed the flow. Infrastructure in
Bangkok was also designed to handle rainwater, not floods, he said.
Vanchai Prapaisuwan, an
executive at the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (Egat), which is
in charge of the Bhumibol and Sirikit dams, said that even if U-curve levels
were adhered to, at times of heavy rainfall water channels below a dam could
flood, regardless of the level in the dam. At the Bhumibol Dam, the upper and
lower U-curve levels were 12 billion and 3.8 billion cubic metres,
respectively.
"Dams should be regarded
as reservoirs, not part of the water-releasing infrastructure," he said.
However, Egat plans to adjust
the U-curve levels to take into account the mass of water that caused the flooding
last year. Meanwhile, Vanchai urged the government to focus on areas that tend
to flood at the beginning of the rainy season. These could be used as
"monkey cheek" catchment areas, as it would be difficult to manage
things if flash floods occur. With monkey cheeks, the situation would be
controllable if Thailand floods again, Vanchai said.
Thongplew added that an
insurance scheme could help ensure smooth management, while tools to gauge
water mass and velocity must be upgraded.
"Water needs a place to
stay. There must be places to slow water. As we can't build new dams, how can
the water be discharged as soon as possible?" he asked.
Chaiporn Siripornpibul, deputy
director-general of the Department of Water Resources, urged the adoption of a
crisis-management plan for use if the phenomenon recurs. Under the plan,
communication with flood-affected people must be handled by a single person, he
said. That would keep them best informed and avoid confusion, Chaiporn said.
"How can people protect
themselves if they don't know that a one-metre-high flood constitutes pressure
of up to 1 tonne per square metre?" he said.
Moreover, the water-management
plan must focus on water storage and release, he said. Local water channels
must be modified, including those in Bangkok.
Chulalongkorn's Chaiyuth
identified three options for handling the situation: adjust dams' capacity to
cope with changes in water volume; adjust rainfall levels - which is difficult;
or introduce an integrated floodway-management scheme and modify the
loss-sharing scheme.
"We need integration. My
concern is that the target for achieving the management plan within six months
is politically driven. The idea is that the risks must be shared. For example,
in Mississippi, the US federal government decided to reclaim some flood-prone
land at a price based on future compensation. We're in need of a sustainable, fair
and reasonable management scheme," he said.
Achara Deboonme and Chularat
Saengpassa
The Nation
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment