Malaysian universities fail to make an impact
in an annual global rankings list for institutions that are reputed for their
teaching and research.
NO
Malaysian university has made the Times Higher Education World Reputation
Rankings 2012, which rank the world’s top 100 institutions by their academic reputation
alone.
The
reputation rankings act as a global index of academic prestige, revealing which
institutions are regarded as the best for teaching and research by many
thousands of experienced scholars all over the world.
It is
an annual reputation rankings, which complement the World University Rankings,
and are based on the world’s largest survey of academic opinion and provide a
unique insight into the shifting academic prestige of institutions.
Reputation
both reflects and drives university success — helping to attract staff,
students, business investment, research partners and benefactions in a highly
competitive global market.
Times
Higher Education Rankings editor Phil Baty said the top top 100 list represents
only around 0.5 percent of the world’s higher education institutions, so to
make it is an exceptional achievement.
In
terms of representation in the top 100 list, the United States (US) and United
Kingdom (UK) are followed by Japan and the Netherlands with five institutions
each, and Germany, Australia and France with four each.
“In
total, 19 countries are on the list, and the US takes 44 of the places, so
competition is very tough. But many governments would be keen to see at least
one national flagship institution in a list like this – demonstrating that they
are competing among the very best in the world, and ensuring they are driving
the economy with cutting edge research and attracting the best academic
talent,” he told StarEducate.
Harvard
University tops the World Reputation Rankings followed by the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and the University of Cambridge.
The mechanics
The
reputation rankings are based on the results of an Academic Reputation Survey
carried out by the professional polling company Ipsos for Times Higher
Education’s rankings data supplier, Thomson Reuters.
Respondents
to the academic reputation survey (available in nine languages) are asked to
name a very small number who are “the best” in both teaching and research,
based on their specialist subject knowledge and their experience and they are
given a list of around 6,000 institutions to choose from.
“So in
that sense, if academics think you are doing exciting and excellent teaching
and research, you will appear in the rankings.
“The
survey is invitation-only and is statistically representative of global
scholarship, so there is nothing any institution can do to get in the list,
other than have a high profile and be well known for excellence all over the
world.
“The
only way to get a properly balanced and fair sample is to select each
respondent to be statistically representative of both their country and their
discipline — it is wrong to let people sign up and volunteer,” he said.
For the
2012 table, some 44% of responses were from the Americas, with 28% from Europe
and 25% from Asia Pacific and the Middle East. About 20% of respondents were
from the physical sciences and engineering and technology respectively wih 19%
from social sciences, 17% in clinical subjects, 16% in life sciences and seven
percent in the arts and humanities.
This
year’s results are based on a record 17,554 responses from senior, published
academics in 137 countries, and is up by 31% on last year’s poll of 13,388
academics.
Baty
said factors that would raise any institution’s profile would include making
sure its academics are publishing cutting-edge research, attending the right
conferences, are part of the right networks, forging international partnerships
and producing the best graduates.
He said
the rankings is a list of the world’s top 100 universities but those in the 51
to100 are grouped into bands of 10.
“This
is in the interests of fairness, as the data differentials between institutions
become very narrow lower down the table,” he added.
He said
Malaysian institutions did receive nominations, but not enough to make the top
100 list. It was not possible to name them as response numbers were
“insufficiently large to allow proper statistical significance”. Malaysian
universities were also not on the list last year.
Higher
Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin said Malaysian universities
need to strengthen their fundamentals first.
“You
don’t see a sudden jump in a few months,” he said when asked to comment on the
lack of Malaysian institutions on the list.
“What I
can say is that, even though the survey is in multiple languages, The response
rate from Asia generally is slightly lower than we get from other parts of the
worlds.
“We
therefore compensate by giving the results from that region a slightly higher
weighting so that the real term number of responses per region corresponds to
the populations of academics and researchers as reported by Unesco.
“This
overcomes any bias caused by differing response rates and ensures that the each
region is fairly represented in the survey,” explained Baty.
Looking East
Although
the US continues to dominate the global top 100 ranking, East Asian
universities in general have improved in their standing, signalling the start
of a power shift from West to East.
“Japan
has maintained an outstanding showing in the global top 100 reputation
rankings, with two universities in the world top 20.
“But
there is also a very exciting group of East Asian countries or regions enjoying
significant increases in the prestige of their universities — with China,
Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore all seeing their top universities rising up the
reputation table.
“This
is against some notable drops for some big-name institutions in the US and UK.
“When
it comes to exciting developments in higher education, all eyes are facing
East.
“There
are clear signs of the start of a power shift from West to East,” explained
Baty.
Outside
the US, the UK has the most top 100 representatives with 10 universities, but
this has declined from 12 last year. Both Oxford and Cambridge maintain their
positions in the top six supergroup. The University of Sheffield, and the
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine are out of the top 100
altogether.
Japan
has five representatives — the University of Tokyo, the University of Kyoto,
the University of Osaka and the University of Tohoku and Tokyo Institute of
Technology. China has two representatives in the top 100 – Tsinghua University
and Peking University. The University of Hong Kong has entered the top 40. The
National University of Singapore has also climbed up the list.
“But
while top reputations can take many years, even centuries to build, in today’s
information-rich, fast-moving and interconnected world, universities can not
sit back and rely on their history.
“New
forces are emerging and signs of declining performance among the establishment
are quickly identified, shared and spread. Established reputations can be
highly vulnerable,” he explained.
KAREN
CHAPMAN
The
Star
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment