(Mizzima)
– Burma’s new law on the right to
peaceful assembly falls far short of international standards, Human Rights
Watch (HRW) said on Wednesday.
Human
Rights Watch urged Burma’s Parliament to repeal the law’s provisions that fail
to meet international human rights standards, such as imprisonment as a penalty
for permit violations, HRW said in a statement.
In the
meantime, the Home Affairs Ministry should consult with international
organizations as it drafts regulations to mitigate some of the law’s harsh
effects.
“Burma’s
new law on assembly rejects the previous ban on demonstrations, but still
allows the government to trump the Burmese people’s basic rights,” said Brad
Adams, HRW Asia director. “There is a lot of excitement about changes in Burma
these days, but the government shouldn’t be given credit for allowing some
freedom just because none existed before. Instead, it should be pressed to make
sure its laws meet international standards.”
The
Burmese government has long used laws banning marches, demonstrations, and
gatherings of more than five people to arrest, prosecute, and imprison peaceful
protesters, said HRW. While ostensibly accepting the right of peaceful
assembly, the new law makes the right subject to the overbroad control and the
discretion of the authorities, it said.
It said
that under international law, legal restrictions on basic freedoms should be
clearly and narrowly identified, strictly necessary, and proportionate.
The new assembly law requires anyone planning
a demonstration to seek permission from the township police chief five days in
advance. Permission is required for any gathering of “more than one person in a
public area … in order to express their opinions.”
The
authorities are required to respond 48 hours before the planned gathering. If
permission is denied, the authorities must offer reasons.
The law
states that the police chief may only refuse a permit if the application is
“contrary to Union security, prevalence of law and order, community peace and
tranquility or public order and morality.”
Organizers
may appeal the decision to the state or regional level police authorities. The
administrative appeals process is final, with no appeal to the courts allowed.
Holding an assembly without permission can
result in a one-year prison sentence. Even if permission is granted, the
assembly law provides criminal penalties of up to six months in prison for
various types of conduct, such as giving speeches that contain false
information, saying anything that could hurt the state and union, or “doing
anything that causes fear, a disturbance or blocks roads, vehicles or the
public.”
“These
offenses are articulated in vague and uncertain terms,” Human Rights Watch
said.
The
original bill banned shouting slogans at public assemblies. Parliament amended
the final bill to allow slogans, but only if they are pre-approved.
“Requiring
approval for the content of slogans shows just how far the government needs to
go to understand basic freedoms,” Adams said. “Peaceful protesters shouldn’t go
to jail just because a police officer may not like what they said.”
Burma
has a long history of repression of peaceful protests. Pro-democracy marches in
1990 were put down by the authorities with lethal force. Security forces killed
an estimated 2,000 protesters. Peaceful marches led by the opposition 88
Generation Students group in August 2007 and Buddhist monks in September 2007
were violently broken up. Human Rights Watch’s investigation documented
killings by the security forces and hundreds of arbitrary arrests. Some protest
leaders were sentenced to over 65 years in prison, and only released in the
government’s January 2012 amnesty.
In 2011, the police forcibly dispersed several
protests in Rangoon, the former capital.
One
small protest on October 27 led to the arrest of eight landless farmers and
their lawyer, activist Phoe Phyu, for illegal assembly after they protested the
forcible acquisition of their land by government-backed companies. Phoe Phyu,
now free on bail pending trial, is also defending a group of farmers who led
protests in the Irrawaddy Delta region in September.
The
authorities also arrested and briefly detained a rights activist, Myint Naing,
in Bassien in November for filming the farmers’ protest and charged him with
distributing unauthorized material under the Electronics Transactions Act.
The
assembly law will not go into force until regulations are drafted. Human Rights
Watch urged the Home Affairs Ministry to consult with relevant international
organizations in drafting the guidelines to mitigate the harsh effects of the
law.
For
instance, HRW said, the regulations could provide guidance to police chiefs
about criteria for granting a permit and the exercise of discretion in the
administrative appeals process.
The
regulations should state clearly that the assembly law is meant to facilitate
gatherings and processions, and the enjoyment of the constitutional right to
assembly, said HRW.
“They
should make clear that permits should not be refused merely because the
gathering might disturb ‘community peace and tranquility.”
The
regulations should clearly define, based on objective criteria terms such as to
‘frighten’ or ‘disturb’ the public, or ‘hurt the state.’ They should clarify
that criminal penalties should only be sought for acts of violence or
incitement and not for the peaceful exercise of rights to expression,
association, and assembly, such as giving false information in a speech or
using unapproved slogans.
Since
taking office in March 2011, Burma’s new government has introduced many bills
into the national bicameral assembly, debating these laws in the three
parliamentary sessions to date in a manner not seen in Burma for decades.
Nevertheless,
the passage of some laws has been shrouded in secrecy. Full drafts of
legislation are often not distributed outside the Parliament, and there has
been little community consultation.
“The
real test of new laws will be to see what happens when Burmese attempt to use them,”
Adams said. “Burma’s government will deserve kudos for legal reform only when
people are allowed to exercise their basic rights.”
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment