While, it has taken far too long to get viral
hepatitis the attention it deserves, global experts cautiously hope that with
successful partnerships and learning from the HIV/AIDS experience, the
Asia-Pacific region can be an example to the rest of the world in controlling
viral hepatitis, reports Viveka Roychowdhury
The
spread of viral hepatitis got special attention at this year's Conference of
the Asia Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) which was held
in February in Taiwan. Even though viral hepatitis, especially B and C, affect
approximately 340 million people across the Asia-Pacific region, most
governments do not have a public health policy in place to tackle this disease.
This is in sharp contrast to the efforts of HIV/AIDS advocacy, which over the
last three decades, has helped to shape public health policy.
Hoping
to adopt and adapt key learnings from HIV/AIDS experience, The Coalition to
Eradicate Viral Hepatitis in Asia Pacific (CEVHAP), organised the 'CEVHAP
Symposium: Better health through better public policies—What Viral Hepatitis
can learn from the HIV experience', on the last day of APASL. The purpose of
the Symposium was to identify advocacy models that might be effectively adapted
within the Asia Pacific region to lobby governments to improve public health
policies to cope with the threat of viral hepatitis.
Such
efforts seem long overdue. In fact it was as late as May 2010, that the World
Health Assembly ratified a resolution on viral hepatitis (WHA63 R18), which for
the first time recognised the full scale of the challenge and finally put viral
hepatitis on the global healthcare agenda, alongside HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria.
The strategy provided a framework for national governments to respond to the
challenge of viral hepatitis within their own borders but also as part of a
cohesive approach to tackle the disease across regions. This was followed by
the World Health Organization (WHO) issuing its Global Hepatitis Strategy which
combines a wide range of its products to assist countries in the development of
national responses to viral hepatitis.
The
CEVHAP Symposium attracted leaders from the global and Asia Pacific viral
hepatitis community as well as WHO regional experts. Giving the welcome
address, PASL Jia-Horng Kao, President of A2012 and Professor and Director,
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of
Medicine highlighted the fact that viral hepatitis is considered endemic in
some parts of the Asia-Pacific region and hoped that the takeaways from the
CEVHAP Symposium would assist policy makers to tackle the situation.
Prof
Ding-Shinn Chen, Immediate Past Dean of the National Taiwan University College
of Medicine and Chair of CEVHAP, then kicked off the Symposium, with an
overview of CEVHAP's goal to be the “bridge between the medical and scientific
community as well as other stakeholders.” While he admitted that the ultimate
goal to eradicate hepatitis would take many years, even generations to achieve,
he stressed that the short term goal is to focus on improving public health
policies to reduce the health, social and economic burden of viral hepatitis in
the Asia-Pacific region. He emphasised the power of collaborative partnerships,
the importance of keeping patients at the centre of advocacy and ended his
presentation by speculating on what would be the catalyst for mobilising a
movement behind viral hepatitis.
Lessons learnt
Giving
the keynote address, titled 'Learning from the Past', David L Thomas, MD,
Director of the Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of
Medicine stressed that the viewpoint has to shift from the individual to the
population. While the first lesson, is that hepatitis treatment saves lives,
but unlike ARVs, this is not yet the case at the population level. Lesson two
followed that improved efficacy means improved urgency, but not necessarily
effectiveness. Lesson three was about reap what you sow, in terms of the impact
on public health being directly in proportion to resources devoted. So while
the massive resources devoted to HIV/AIDS (through PEPFAR, etc.) saw a
reduction in mortality due to HIV/AIDS, the same is not the case with viral
hepatitis because the political will is absent, as are the celebrities
endorsing and supporting advocacy movements.
Thomas'
fourth lesson is that there is more to the disease than the virus, as borne out
by the fact that a study showed that there was markedly lower survival for
HIV/HCV co-infected persons in Denmark during highly active anti-retroviral
therapy, from 2000-2005. The fifth and final lesson is that prevention is
better than treatment. He pointed out that the annual incidence of liver cancer
in children in Taiwan was markedly reduced by HBV vaccination. Elimination is
of course, the best form of prevention, with small pox being the best example.
Looking
ahead Thomas said, controlling chronic hepatitis in the population requires
more work on improving safety and efficacy of treatments, expanding testing and
treatment access, educating to expand political and societal commitment.
Preventing new infections, together with curing existing infections will
ultimately lead to the elimination of hepatitis.
Successful collaborations
The
next two speakers, Ali Sulaiman, Lecturer in Internal Medicine, Department of
Medicine University of Indonesia and Benjamin Cowie, WHO Regional Reference
Laboratory for Hepatitis B, VIDRL Board of Directors, Australasian Society for
HIV Medicine were a classic example of the importance of leveraging
partnerships and collaborations in containing diseases like HIV/AIDS in the
past and now viral hepatitis. Developing countries like Sulaiman's home country
Indonesia, bear the greatest disease burden and challenges due to viral
hepatitis. For instance, Sulaiman said that only five per cent of hepatitis
cases have access to medicine, clearly pointing to barriers that go beyond the
clinic. But hopefully this will change. Sulaiman pointed out that while his
government spearheaded the celebration of viral hepatitis day in the past two
years, the backbone of such programmes is medicine access programmes.
Cowie
spoke about translating the Australasian Society for HIV Medicine's (ASHM's)
learnings from HIV to hepatitis, pointing out that while there is increasing
evidence for HBV antiviral therapy as a cancer prevention strategy, antiviral
effect on disease progression is reduced when resistance develops. Therefore
partnerships with clinicians like ASHM's preceptorship programme, imparting
primary care management of HCV for Indonesian primary care doctors and
internists, are crucial. Cowie expressed the hope that maybe the Asia-Pacific
region can be an example to the rest of the world in controlling viral
hepatitis.
There
is no doubt of the patient's role as an important stakeholder and even catalyst
to policy change, hence patient advocacy groups (PAGs) have a very crucial
role. Speaking about the development of PAGs in viral hepatitis, Charles Gore,
President, World Hepatitis Alliance, himself a patient of hepatitis C and
cirrhosis, spoke about the need to raise viral hepatitis up the agenda and the
role conferences like APASL and associations like CEVHAP need to play to build
up the patient voice in the Asia-Pacific region.
The WHO viral hepatitis strategy
Professor
Stephen Locarnini, Head, WHO Regional Reference Laboratory for hepatitis B,
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia and
Joint Secretary, CEVHAP outlined the four key priorities of the WHO Viral
Hepatitis Strategy. Partnership, mobilisation and communication come first,
followed by collection of data to help shape for policy and action. Prevention
of transmission forms the third axis followed by screening, care and treatment.
Locarnini
cautioned that there were many challenges, not least the need to fully staff
the WHO HQ team as well as fully fund the 2012-2013 work plan. Operationalising
the global hepatitis network, translating the HQ strategy at the regional
level, contributing to country strategy and technical support as well as
finally producing results and actually impacting viral hepatitis are the many
challenges in the path ahead.
Speaking
as the co-founder of CEVHAP, he summarised its work since its inception, saying
that it has established a solid base, with strong membership and a unique
position. Current and planned projects can provide strong data and evidence to
influence policy but will require strong follow-up on the ground. Therefore he
stressed that it is imperative that CEVHAP works closely with other groups at
global, regional and national levels to share data and best practices and
maximise impact
The
Symposium concluded with a panel discussion, chaired by Locarnini, with the
panellists (Gore, Rosmawati Mohamed, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Henry
Lik-Yuen Chan, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Jack Wallace, La Trobe
University, Melbourne) giving their views on what the viral hepatitis sector
needed to catalyse a movement.
expresspharmaonline.com
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment