As China, the Philippines and Vietnam argue
over the South China Sea the waters are being over fished and polluted. And
conflict could be around the corner.
Many
citizens of China, the Philippines and Vietnam won’t have heard of the tiny
scraps of land in the South China Sea that their governments compete with one
another to claim. Certainly, almost none will ever set eyes on them.
So are
places like Scarborough Shoal, the scene of Beijing and Manila’s latest
maritime spat this month, really worth all the aggravation? And whose fault is
it that these confrontations, which have the potential to start wars – and at
the very least to kill fishermen and sailors – keep on happening?
Tiny,
uninhabitable islets like Scarborough Shoal have little value per se, but the
resources that surround them have plenty. The islets serve as pins in a map,
around which governments can draw dotted lines and claim ownership over
everything that lies within.
It’s
these resources – the food even more, perhaps, than the oil or gas – that make
stability in the South China Sea matter.
“The
urgency is that these areas are being overfished and polluted, and that’s
threatening the food supply of millions of people,” says Carlyle Thayer, an
Emeritus Professor at the Australian Defence Force Academy who closely follows
disputes in the South China Sea. “That’s something these countries have to
start taking seriously.”
Fishing
grounds can, of course, be shared, just as undersea energy reserves can be
co-developed. But as Thayer points out, marine environments must be managed, as
well as shared. If there’s a perception that fishermen from other countries are
abusing resources in disputed waters and endangering livelihoods and food
supplies, then that will inevitably trigger an angry response from the other
claimants.
So
putting an end to the South China Sea disputes is important from a security
perspective. But it’s also important from a food security perspective. As
things stand, the South China risks a textbook “tragedy of the commons,” the
destruction of common resources over which no single authority has control.
In
addition, Thayer points out that oil licenses will be granted in the near
future, potentially causing further upset. And all this comes as most of the
interested parties are investing in their navies and, in China’s case, in
paramilitary maritime agencies. “The South China Sea bathtub is being filled up
more and more by Chinese control vessels, and by other countries’ patrol
vessels and submarines,” he says.
This
approaching spike in contestation makes it all the more important that a
solution be found now, and the diplomatic activity of the past year suggests
that one is attainable. ASEAN has been China’s main interlocutor on South China
Sea issues, and Beijing made an important goodwill gesture last November when
it put up $475 million to create a China-ASEAN Maritime Co-operation Fund.
Several ASEAN-China expert working groups are also now in place.
The key
process of 2012 is the drafting of a Code of Conduct (COC) governing behavior
in the South China Sea – and envisaged as being more far-reaching than the
existing Declaration of Conduct (DOC). Crucially, ASEAN is writing the new
code. The association is due to present China with its proposals in July, and
Beijing will be under political pressure to accept the ASEAN formula, rather
than appear domineering by rejecting the plan. The existing process also
excludes the United States, which is to China’s liking. Furthermore, “China has
Cambodia in the box seat at the moment [as ASEAN chair],” adds Thayer. If the idea of giving
ASEAN ownership of the drafting process was to produce a robust agreement, then
it doesn’t appear to be working out that way. Whether China is deliberately
undermining the drafting process, or whether some ASEAN members are simply too
timid to risk crossing Beijing by making the new rules too tough, the COC is in
danger of falling short.
“The
issue is that [the countries involved] say, ‘Let’s agree not to interfere when
it’s someone else’s waters, but we don’t know who owns what’,” observes Thayer.
“You need to have either EEZs or co-operative zones, but we aren’t seeing
co-operation in these areas.”
The
Philippines has attempted to address this point, with President Benigno Aquino
promoting the concept of the South China Sea as a “Zone of Peace, Freedom,
Friendship and Cooperation.”
“What
is ours is ours, and with what is disputed, we can work towards joint
cooperation,” Aquino suggested. In the Philippine conception of the COC,
sovereignty issues would therefore be set aside, and rules of the road laid out
to establish a modus vivendi in the South China Sea’s grey areas.
Would
China agree to go along with such an arrangement?
Beijing’s
resolve may not even be tested, with other ASEAN members highly equivocal about
setting a precedent that grants special status to disputed territories. In
other words, they are unable to set sovereignty aside in these few specific
areas, even in the interests of maintaining regional stability.
China
has its own issues to attend to, the most pressing being the tangle of
paramilitary naval agencies – of which China has at least five – that currently
police the South China Sea. “This incident [at Scarborough Shoal] raises the
question of whether China is a unitary actor,” says Thayer, with reference to
the unprecedented response of the China Maritime Surveillance agency, which
dispatched two vessels to the Shoal, thus beginning the stand-off with the
Philippine Navy’s flagship. “Clearly, there are independent actors trying to do
their own thing,” he says. Senior People’s Liberation Army figures have already
publicly discussed the need to stand up a national coast guard to bring all
these different maritime actors into line. Beijing should press ahead with this
structural reform if it wants to take firm control over South China Sea policy.
Keeping
fishermen out of sensitive waters is also important – though difficult to
enforce, both practically and politically. “Fishermen go where the fish are,”
Thayer says. “And can China politically rein in the fishermen and stop them
going to places that textbooks say are Chinese islands?”
The
best incentive that China could have for taking its maritime agencies and
fishing fleets in hand would be the inception of a robust COC. The onus for
this is on ASEAN. It’s worth remembering that ASEAN is in theory moving towards
the implementation of a new ASEAN Political-Security Community in 2015, by
which time ASEAN is supposed to speak with one voice on security issues. If the
ASEAN members can resolve to speak with one voice on the South China Sea, then
China-ASEAN confrontations, far from becoming more frequent and more dangerous,
should grow rarer and easier to manage.
If
ASEAN fails in its duty to draft a meaningful code, then it’s naïve to think
that Chinese and Vietnamese and Philippine ships will continue to face off peaceably
in the South China Sea’s anarchic waters. “They aren’t just going to keep
meeting each other eye to eye and then walk away,” concludes Thayer. “At some
point there has to be friction or violence.”
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
Dear
Reader,
May I
invite you to visit our new blog: IIMS-Asean http://iims-asean.blogspot.com/
News
and activities of the International Institute of Medicine and Science Asean
Chapter of IIMS, Inc. California, USA - Health care, Life Science, Education,
Research, Philanthropy. Asean is the economic organisation of ten countries
located in South East Asia: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR,
Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. IIMS is a
non-profit organization.
No comments:
Post a Comment