The competition for resources, the
development of international marine laws and the contest for strategic
locations are behind the South China Sea territorial disputes. In recent years,
the U.S. has played an increasingly important role in the issue.
South
China Sea disputes are rooted in the pursuit of natural resources.
The
South China Sea, considered by many as “the second Persian Gulf,” boasts energy
reserves of more than 20 billion tons of oil and gas, in addition to rich
mineral and marine life resources.
In
recent years, with the increasing demand for energy as economies grow and
global oil prices rise, some countries around the South China Sea region have
sped up the exploitation of oil and gas in the resourceful area. They have
tried every means to claim their so-called sovereignty in this region and
signed agreements for joint development of resources with countries outside the
region.
South
China Sea disputes rise as contemporary international marine law develops.
Since
the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was issued in 1982, some
countries unilaterally claimed 200-mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and
delimited the continental shelf in the South China Sea. Vietnam, the
Philippines and Malaysia laid claims one after another to all or part of the
Nansha Islands while speeding up oil and gas drilling in the region. All these
claims and exploitation bred disputes between China (including Taiwan region)
and other neighboring countries, namely Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia,
Brunei and Indonesia, on island sovereignty and maritime demarcation.
The
strategic location of the region plays an important part in South China Sea
disputes.
The
South China Sea region is one of the busiest sea lanes in the world, through
which pass more than half of the world’s merchant fleet tonnage, one third of
global marine trade volume and half of energy supplies to Northeast Asia,
including 80 percent of oil traffic to Japan, South Korea and China's Taiwan
region.
From a
military perspective, whoever occupies the islands in the South China Sea would
directly or indirectly take control of most seaways through the Strait of
Malacca as well as those from West Asia, Africa and Europe to East Asia.
Since
the end of the cold war, the South China Sea region has become increasingly
important in geopolitics and marine traffic. With the newfound resources and
the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea going into effect, some
Southeast Asian countries are laying further claims to the islands, the EEZ and
the continental shelf in the South China Sea. The escalation of the disputes
between China and Southeast Asian neighbors on island sovereignty and maritime
demarcation has received increased attention from ASEAN and western countries
including the U.S. and Japan, making the South China Sea issue a security focus
in the international community.
The
global financial crisis hit Southeast Asia in 2008, raising living cost and
lowering living standards there. To stop the economic crisis turning into
social unrest, some neighboring countries chose to divert the domestic
dissatisfaction by hyping the so-called “China threat” and territorial disputes
in the South China Sea.
The financial
crisis also struck a heavy blow at the export-oriented economy of most
Southeast Asian countries, which depends heavily on the international economic
environment. With the unceasingly rising global oil prices, some countries have
turned to count on the South China Sea exploitation for energy supplies.
The
rapid rise of China has encouraged a school of thought among Southeast Asian
countries to guard against the growing big power. Since China surpassed Japan
as the world’s second-largest economy in 2010, those countries began seeking to
ride China’s momentum to develop their economy. Meanwhile, they feared that a
thriving China would seek regional or global hegemony. Some international media
took the opportunity to incite Southeast Asian countries to confront China.
In
recent years, the U.S. has played an increasingly important role in the South
China Sea disputes.
In
2009, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared the country would return
its attention to Southeast Asia. As some dispute-involved countries, including
Vietnam and the Philippines, actively sought support from major international
powers, the U.S. has gradually switched more of its marine strategic focus to
East Asia, challenging China for sea power and dominance in Southeast Asia.
After
the assertion of a national interest in the South China Sea disputes in 2010,
the U.S. has sped up deployments of its naval units and expanded its military
base in Guam, strengthening supervision over East Asian waters.
U.S.
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, who vowed to enhance military strength in
Asia-Pacific region after taking office, stressed the importance of Southeast
Asia in U.S. regional security policies at the annual ASEAN defense ministerial
meeting in October, 2011.
Chu Hao
The
author is a researcher in Southeast Asia studies at the China Institutes of
Contemporary International Relations.
(This article
was first published in Chinese and translated by Li Xiao.)
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
No comments:
Post a Comment