An opinion article in the June 14 issue of
The Wall Street Journal noted the “striking” lack of support for the
Philippines, in its standoff with China over Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal, from
fellow member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
“Asean’s
deafening silence is disappointing, but not surprising. The member states are
divided on how best to deal with the problem due to differing national interests,
including the value they place on their relationships with China,” wrote Ian
Storey, currently a senior fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
in Singapore. “The result is a lack of cohesion and inaction.”
In fact
ASEAN is acting true to form, with each state looking after its own interest or
maintaining the grouping’s long-held policy of non-interference in fellow
members’ internal affairs.
Manila’s
row with Beijing is not strictly internal. ASEAN members Brunei, Malaysia and
Vietnam, apart from Taiwan, are also challenging China’s claim over nearly the
entire South China Sea. (It used to be called just the South Sea. Who put the
“China” there? Why not call it the East Vietnam Sea? Or the West Philippine
Sea? Or North Malaysia or Brunei Sea? Look at the map.)
It’s
not the first time, however, that ASEAN is steering clear of a territorial
dispute between one of its members and China. Vietnam, which joined ASEAN on
July 28, 1995, lost the Paracel Islands (and 50 sailors) in a naval battle with
China in January 1974. Hanoi has not dropped its claim over the Paracels, and
denounces continuing harassment of its fishermen by the Chinese. In January
2005, the Chinese navy shot and killed nine Vietnamese, described by Hanoi as
fishermen, and wounded eight others in the Gulf of Tonkin. Beijing said the men
were pirates.
ASEAN
also did not take sides in that case.
The
45th ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting will be held next month in Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia. If it’s any consolation to Filipinos who are feeling abandoned by
neighbors, there is an active effort within ASEAN to come up with a united
stand on the South China Sea dispute, for presentation at the meeting.
I was
told that there are only two holdouts on the statement. One is reportedly the
host, Malaysia, with whom the Philippines also has an unresolved territorial
dispute over Sabah, although the area is currently governed by Kuala Lumpur.
The other holdout is Myanmar.
The
case of Myanmar is one where the ASEAN policy of non-interference has been
openly breached, most notably by the Philippines. In recent years Manila was
vocal in its calls for democratic reforms in Myanmar.
Although
ASEAN was started by Southeast Asian autocrats including Ferdinand Marcos, and
stopping the spread of communism rather than authoritarianism was one of the
original reasons for the establishment of the grouping, the oppressive Myanmar
regime, which built a new capital in Naypyidaw, was becoming an embarrassment
for ASEAN.
So
perhaps Naypyidaw is not keen on supporting Manila in a dispute with Myanmar’s
closest ally, China.
During
the recent visit in Manila of Myanmar Foreign Minister U Wunna Maung Lwin, the
Panatag dispute was reportedly discussed. The Philippines’ Department of
Foreign Affairs said the two sides reiterated the importance of freedom of
navigation and unimpeded commerce in the South China Sea. But there was no word
on the proposed ASEAN statement.
Myanmar’s
military junta relied heavily on Chinese financial and other forms of support
when the country was struggling through international sanctions.
But
under President Thein Sein, Myanmar looks headed inexorably toward democratic
reforms, especially with the release of Aung San Suu Kyi after nearly two
decades of detention and her assumption of a seat in parliament after free
elections.
Suu
Kyi, who over the weekend finally received her Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo 21
years after it was awarded, is the new face of the Myanmar government. She is
generating a lot of international goodwill for her country, much as Corazon
Aquino did for the Philippines after the 1986 people power revolt.
There
are predictions of a flood of investments and tourists to Suu Kyi’s country. A
Western diplomat whose investors are already ahead of the rest in Myanmar told
me that what could deter the flood are Myanmar’s infrastructure and regulatory
environment for investments and tourism, which he said are currently worse than
those of the Philippines (ouch).
With
that expected flood, the reformist government in Myanmar no longer has to be
dependent on Beijing for foreign aid and job-generating investments.
For all
the criticism of ASEAN as a useless grouping, there is one bright spot: its
members have not been at war with each other since the group was founded on
Aug. 8, 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.
There
have been border skirmishes in recent years between military forces of Cambodia
and Thailand. But the situation could be worse if the two countries weren’t
talking to each other through ASEAN.
The
Philippines is conducting joint patrols with Malaysia in common waters, despite
the two countries’ dispute over Sabah. Kuala Lumpur is also assisting in
Manila’s peace negotiations with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.
The
Philippines might get support, though indirectly, from Spain when it puts on
exhibit 134 ancient maps of its former Southeast Asian colony, showing Panatag
(also Panacot Shoal and Bajo de Masinloc) as part of Las Islas Filipinas.
The
maps, owned by private collectors from several countries, will be put on
exhibit for the first time to coincide with Philippine-Spanish Friendship Day
on June 30 and Friendship Week. Spain’s Queen Sofia will be in town for the
celebrations.
“Three
Hundred Years of Philippine Maps 1598-1898” will run from June 26 to July 31 at
the Metropolitan Museum of Manila, according to Spanish Ambassador Jorge
Domecq.
Perhaps
the maps can help certain ASEAN members make up their minds about territorial
disputes in the West Philippine Sea.
Singapore,
the smallest though certainly not the least of the ASEAN members, has been one
of the most active in pushing for Southeast Asian economic integration and
unity in many aspects including regional defense and trade negotiations. Its
size probably intensifies Singapore’s awareness of the adage that in unity
there is strength.
That
unity isn’t there in our dispute with China over Panatag.
Ana
Marie Pamintuan
The
Philippine Star
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
No comments:
Post a Comment