"If Asean does not hang
together, they shall be hung separately," said S. Rajaratnam, then
Singaporean foreign minister, on the reason why the grouping must stick
together in the early hours after the establishment of Asean in 1967.
At this juncture, Cambodian
Foreign Minister Hor Nam Hong is still communicating with his Asean colleagues
to work out an alternative document that would contain the decisions of the
failed joint communiqué, which was not issued at their last meeting in
Cambodia.
Somehow, mutual trust has been
lost among them, which urgently needs to be restored. Up until the weekend,
|they had only agreed on a list of key action-oriented outcomes. The problem
is, the list, which needs a consensus, still does not contain the controversial
South China Sea dispute.
Within diplomatic circuits in
Asean, in the past weeks stories of how Hor Nam Hong snubbed the joint efforts
by Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa and Singaporean Foreign
Minister K. Shanmugam at the last minute to save the draft were widespread.
Some Asean countries are very
concerned that the South China Sea is overshadowing all other issues in Asean.
If this disagreement continues it could spoil the upcoming series of summits
scheduled in the third week of November as well as other future plans.
Following Indonesian President
Bambang Susilo Yudhoyono and Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's
personal appeal to Prime Minister Hun Sen, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak
recently wrote to him the other day with a strong message that Asean must not
let the South China Sea dispute affect the building of the Asean Community.
Shamefully absent from all these
endeavors is Thailand, the current coordinating country of Asean-China
relations. However, Hun Sen responded unwittingly by referring to a letter
dated July 26 dispatched by Hor Nam Hong to his colleagues. The letter was
about the chair's effort to come up with an internal document that detailed the
decisions made in the July meeting, which failed to mention the dispute.
If Asean is unable to come up
with a new document in the next 48 hours, it could represent the darkest
chapter of its history. Most importantly, it will reflect badly on the chair as
Cambodia earlier tried to highlight the grouping's success in the past 45 years
under its chair. The Phnom Penh Declaration was issued to that effect, which
has now proved to be hollow.
There have been some informal
discussions among officials and academics about the need to come up with the
rules of procedure to guide a rotating chair in the future. At the moment,
there are no clear rules concerning the Asean chair and its relations with
other Asean organs and how the Asean Secretary General and its staff can be of
assistance. The Asean foreign ministers took things for granted that they would
be able to form a consensus on any issue as in the past four decades. But the
Phnom Penh incident changed all that.
More importantly, there must be a
review of the position of Secretary General and the Secretariat for the benefit
of coordination and cross-sectoral cooperation. Indeed, the disagreements among
the Asean members over the maritime dispute have rendered urgency to the
various recommendations submitted last year by Secretary General Dr. Surin
Pitsuwan. In his special report concerning challenges facing Asean and its
secretariat to Indonesia, which chaired Asean last year, he urged the Asean
leaders to spell out clearly various roles and duties of each Asean organ and
how they relate to each other.
After the Asean Charter came into
effect in 2008, new organs were created to help the member countries adhere to
numerous Asean agreements and commitments. These were the Asean Coordinating
Council, Asean Political-Security Council, Asean Economic Community Council,
Asean Socio-Cultural Council, the Committee of Permanent Representatives, et
al. At the same time, the position of Secretary General of Asean has been
conferred as the Chief Administrative Officer of Asean with a ministerial rank.
Surin was the first Asean head with a ministerial rank before serving in the
secretariat. That helps explain why Surin's successor, Le Luong Minh from
Vietnam, is a vice foreign minister.
Soon the Asean leaders will have
to decide whether the Asean Charter need to be reviewed in order to improve the
efficiency of decision making within the organization. After the charter came
into force, member countries adopted a list of supplementary agreements, which
continues until today. As long as these negotiations are not complete, the flow
of operations at various levels within Asean will not be smooth. The lack of
clarity on the roles and relationships among the various organs within Asean
has caused serious structural problems in running day-to-day activities.
Here are some important questions
that the Asean leaders must address. Is the Secretary General of Asean the only
Asean representative with ministerial rank? Given his/her wider access |to
summits and ministerial meetings including G20 and other global forums, is the
Secretary General distinctive from other foreign ministers or sectorial
ministers in Asean? If so, what sort of value do the Asean governments attach
to the unique perspective of Asean articulated by the Secretary General?
It is an open secret that Dr.
Surin has tried consistently to raise these pertinent issues in the past two
years to pave the way for a more efficient secretariat in the future. Indonesia
and Thailand have been supportive of his endeavours. Deep down, other more
conservative members want continued ambiguities to reign because whenever there
are controversies, the Asean leaders or ministers will have the final say. Even
though Asean is more integrated than before, there is no plan to allow the
Asean chief to speak on their behalf. As such, new and existing programs and
activities could come to a halt if their decisions are not put into official
records, such as the case in Phnom Penh.
As a rule-based organiation,
Asean needs to review the charter and undertake further bold reform efforts.
Brunei, the Asean chair next year, must seize the initiative now. Surin's
recommendations should also be given full support as he knows firsthand about
the organization’s potentials and pitfalls from his five-year experience.
Without these reforms, Asean will
be plagued with growing national interests depleting the common Asean interests
that will further weaken Asean as a whole.
Kavi Chongkittavorn
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
No comments:
Post a Comment