Canada has much to do if it desires a greater role in Asia-Pacific
There is something peculiar about
Defense Minister Peter McKay’s statement about Canada’s need for a “permanent,
visible” military presence in the Asia-Pacific region.
To take part in joint naval
exercises with regional allies, and combat piracy, drug trafficking, and human
smuggling is not without merit. However, all of this appears to be another pie
in the sky scenario in which the navy will somehow find the time, materiel and
personnel to carry out these objectives, in addition to its commitments
elsewhere around the globe and, most importantly, at home.
The minister is not wrong in
demanding Canada to increase its presence in Asia-Pacific, but there are
alternatives to developing our relationships in the region other than a
strictly military basis. Unless significant investment is made into the
Canadian Forces, specifically the Royal Canadian Navy, Minister McKay’s hopes
of offering a sustained military presence in the region is all talk and no
show.
Rather, while developing closer
military ties to our regional allies is important, what does it say about
Canada when it is neither a member of the East Asia Summit (EAS) or the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)? If Canada is to have any role in the region,
it must work towards establishing goodwill and gaining the trust of those
countries.
Establishing the Canadian Brand in Asia-Pacific
There is perhaps a belief in some
circles on Parliament Hill that Canada can replicate US strategy in
Asia-Pacific and succeed. However, one would be quick to note that the US
possesses the military assets necessary to maintain a sustained presence in the
region. Moreover, Canada has neither the same history nor ties to the region as
the US. Canada is, on the whole, a fairly new player.
In an address to the Canadian
Council of Chief Executives by Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird in September
2012, Canada would pursue a four-pronged approach in Asia-Pacific: it would
enhance trade in the region, assist in regional security and improve local
governance, following through on commitments, and promoting Canadian values.
The goal is not simply to provide
opportunities to Canadian businesses, but for Canada to present itself as a
serious player in Asia-Pacific. By working in and alongside these countries,
Canada can slowly forge and strengthen its ties not only to individual
countries but to the region. It is about promoting the Canadian brand--a
challenge in and of itself.
It goes without saying that
Canada does not possess the same market as the United States or European Union.
While Canadian oil is in demand in growing countries like China, there is
little else that Canada can offer that the US or EU cannot or does not. For the
Government of Canada, the challenge is promoting the Canadian brand in Asia as
something more than just another Western market.
Canada is stability, as proven by
its economic resilience during the recession. Canada has thus far avoided the
economic crisis plaguing the US and Europe. True, the Canadian market may be small
in comparison to the US and EU. Equally true, however, is that said market is
less volatile; and in these uncertain times, a stable market is a rare thing.
What Canada can offer is its
expertise in managing an economy. Do we profess to be the best in the world? Of
course not, although few other countries can say they weathered the recession
as well as Canada did.
The Price of Doing Business
The job at hand for Prime
Minister Harper, Minister Baird, and the Canadian government is to sell Asia on
its expertise and the idea of Canada; providing opportunities for Canadian
businesses is merely a bonus.
There is, however, a price of
doing business in Asia-Pacific. Countries like Burma, Cambodia, and Laos are
mired in poverty and corruption. More developed countries like Indonesia,
Malaysia, and Vietnam fare better but are not without problems. When the price
of doing business is to turn a blind eye to the arrests of internet bloggers
and human rights and pro-democracy activists, will Canadian leaders and businesses
do so?
Asia-Pacific is more than just
Australia, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and New Zealand – countries sharing
many, if not the same, values as Canada. While it has been easy for Canada and
the international community to wag their fingers at offending countries like
Vietnam, there has not been a serious effort at demanding reform (with the
exception of Burma).
If Canada is intent on
establishing its presence in the region, it must also deal with governments
that, as of present, do not share many of the same values as Canada. In these
less than democratic states, where corruption and human rights abuses are
rampant, Canada cannot shy away. It must engage these countries at every level
of government.
Many of these countries would
like nothing more than to access new markets. As was with China and Vietnam, it
is not a question of ideology (Communism is effectively dead) but money. In the
case of China and Vietnam, however, the former is large enough to dictate how
and with whom it does business; Vietnam simply cannot.
In dealing with countries like
Vietnam, where previous attempts by the international community to demand
reform have failed (and fallen on deaf ears), Canada must be delicate but firm.
Access to Canadian markets must be reciprocated--that is, Canadian businesses
must also have equal access to Vietnamese markets. More than just trade,
however, through establishing goodwill and trust, Canada can broach the subject
of reform and perhaps influence matters.
However, for such an opportunity
to present itself, Canada cannot be regarded as a mere trade partner. For
Canada, it cannot be a matter of dollars at the end of a balance sheet. None of
this is to suggest that Canada can, without a shadow of a doubt, affect
political reform in Vietnam or other countries like it. But Canada cannot, as a
matter of principle, abandon its values in pursuit of new business
opportunities.
Where Minister Baird’s
four-pronged approach to Asia-Pacific is concerned, the core must be the
promotion of Canadian values, as if to say, “We are here to work and we are to
help; but this is what we believe, and we will not look the other way.”
Looking Outward
There are of course naysayers who
believe Canada is wasting its time, and that efforts should be focused at home
than chasing uncertain opportunities abroad. Some might even argue that we will
invite trouble by speaking out against another country’s internal affairs. All
of this may or may not be true, but Canada cannot simply turn away from
Asia-Pacific. With or without us, the world will continue to turn.
If Canada fails to establish its
presence in Asia-Pacific, others will gladly take its place. Canada risks
falling behind, economically and politically on the international stage, if it
does not secure and strengthen its relationships in the region. As exemplified
by Canada’s current omission from the EAS and TPP, not only will Canadian
businesses lose out but so will our ability to have any say in the region.
We no longer live in a world
where we can shield ourselves from troubles abroad by burying our heads in the
sand. All the same, speaking out against problems abroad does little to resolve
these problems. Words alone are not enough. The crimes committed by the
offending government will continue to persist.
Canada and Canadians like to
believe that they are stalwart supporters of democracy and human rights. We
take great pride in championing causes we believe to be noble, just, and right.
But if Canada is truly a defender of democracy and human rights, then it must
do so, despite whatever inconvenience will come about.
Of course, it is neither the job
nor the responsibility of Canada to police the behaviors of others around the
world; however, if this country seeks to pursue a principled, values-based
foreign policy then there cannot be exceptions.
It is not enough for Canada to
engage in Asia-Pacific. It is also not enough that Canada simply wag its
fingers when another country does wrong. Canada cannot hope to promote its
values in another country if it does not invest in said country; but it cannot
and should not invest without upholding the values it holds dear. To cast aside
our values as a matter of convenience will damage Canada’s credibility abroad.
Through trade and working with
the government on matters of security and governance--such as providing
oversight for free and fair elections, and assisting in building democratic
institutions--Canada would be able to re-establish its goodwill that has long
since been absent in the region.
Khanh Vu Duc
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. Since we are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, you may contact us at: sbc.pte@gmail.com, provisionally. Many thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment