After the 21st ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh last month, the leaders of the
member states were relieved, left with some hope that China would soon enter
into negotiations on a binding code of conduct in the South China Sea.
After all, the ASEAN+1 meeting
with China went smoothly, with both sides showing restraint. Outgoing Chinese
Premier Wen Jiabao urged ASEAN to discuss the conflict within the existing
ASEAN-China framework and not to internationalize the issue. He emphasized that
the code of conduct (COC) was a "natural progression" from the
guideline document involving the concerned parties in the South China Sea
issued in 2002. That was a political document declaring the intention and
commitment of all parties: China and ASEAN. In return, the grouping stressed
the need to have the COC as soon as possible as a tool to manage the dispute
and govern the behavior of claimants in the future.
In addition, Cambodian Prime
Minister Hun Sen contributed a display of brinkmanship with a last minute
compromise over a controversial sentence pinpointing that ASEAN would not
internationalize the South China Sea conflict.
Several ASEAN leaders, including
those of claimants and non-claimants, were unhappy with the conclusion, which
they said was not reflected in the discussion.
Instead of dismissing the
statement over the disagreement, Hun Sen agreed with the amendment and released
his final statement, capping five months of angst after the ASEAN foreign
ministers failed to issue a joint communiqué at the end of their meeting over a
similar disagreement earlier in the year.
Unfortunately, though, the same
angst is now morphing into real concern among the ASEAN members about China's
latest unilateral moves, including the use of a new passport depicting the
disputed areas—including Arunachal Pradesh and Aksai Chin and the South China
Sea—as its territory.
Then, there is a plan beginning
next month for the Hainan police to board and search ships entering disputed
areas that China considers its territorial waters. Before that, in July,
Beijing announced the formation of a new administrative unit in Sansha city on
Yongxing Island, known as Woody Island, in the disputed Paracels Island chain.
In several media interviews over
the past week, outgoing ASEAN Secretary-General Surin Pitsuwan has sternly
warned that the situation in the South China Sea could get out of hand. He
likened the conflict to the Palestine problem, with the potential to cause
further conflict and polarize the region and international community at large.
"It would have a very disturbing effect on the wider region; it will be
divisive and contentious with far-reaching ramifications," he said in a
telephone interview in Bangkok.
Surin, whose five-year tenure
ends this month, also reiterated that ASEAN must get its act together and stay
united, otherwise it would be difficult to show solidarity and increase its
bargaining power. ASEAN can no longer stay idle as major powers are using the
grouping as a platform to express their security concerns. Surin pointed out
that while ASEAN has contributed to the global recovery—maintaining trade,
raising consumption and attracting foreign investment, drawing major economic
powerhouses of the region together—it has not yet come together on key
political and security issues. "ASEAN must be united and must speak with
one voice," he reiterated. "Otherwise, no one will respect or take us
seriously."
At a Pattaya meeting in October
ahead of the ASEAN summit, senior officials from China and ASEAN held
consultations without reaching common ground on key issues. The one-day meeting
was supposed to serve as a precursor to kick off the COC negotiations this
month.
According to officials attending
the meeting, the chief of the Chinese delegation, Madame Fu Ying, was very
tough on ASEAN's positions over the dispute. She took to task the grouping for
allowing other parties to intervene in the ongoing discussion and negotiations
over the dispute. Her main complaint was that the issue was now being discussed
in all sorts of international platforms including the United Nations, the
Non-aligned Movement and the Asia Europe Meeting.
At this particular juncture,
China, she added, would not be able to commit to any specific date to begin the
much-awaited COC negotiations, due to the leadership transition in China. The
newly appointed leaders will take over next March, which means both sides have
to work on the conditions conducive to the COC negotiations in the next four
months.
In Pattaya, China listed six
common misunderstandings, culled from ASEAN statements and numerous reports,
pertaining to the COC negotiations, which ASEAN needs to address before the
drafting can start.
First of all, the East Asia
Summit will be peaceful if there is a COC; without it, it will be a stalemate.
Secondly, the COC is aimed at regulating China's behavior alone. Thirdly, ASEAN
will use the COC to consolidate its claims and push China to give up its
sovereignty. Fourthly, the COC has been the work of outsiders, due to their constant
calls on China and ASEAN to begin the drafting. Fifthly, the COC is a
negotiation between China and the ASEAN 10 as stated in the grouping's Proposed
Common Elements on the COC. Finally, the COC will not confine the South China
Sea issue only to ASEAN and China.
With such perceptions imbedded
deep in the Chinese mind, it is hard to foresee how ASEAN could overturn these
allegations in the next few months. At present, from ASEAN's vantage point,
what the group is witnessing is the reiteration of China's position and
sovereignty claims over the disputed territories, a position it has held since
the dispute was brought into the open in July 2010.
The more China continues to
emphasize its control over the freedom and safety of navigation in the South
China Sea, the more concern it will generate in the region and international
community, because ASEAN does not accept China's claimed sovereignty in the
first place. Therefore, Beijing's reassurances over freedom and safety of
navigation and ASEAN's questioning of such control run counter to each
other—this is the gist of the ongoing conflict.
From the Chinese perspective, any
doubts raised over freedom and safety issues are tantamount to non-acceptance
of China's sovereignty over the whole South China Sea. It is unacceptable.
ASEAN-China differences derive
from interpretations of cosmologies as conceived by China and ASEAN. If they
remain unresolved, it would have a domino effect in widening the perception
gaps between the two—China on one side and ASEAN on the other.
The most dangerous part is that
China could find itself increasingly isolated in one corner as the ASEAN side
is joined and backed by the US and the rest of the global community who
continue to stress the rule of law and relevant international laws including
the UN Law of the Sea.
Whenever China and its leaders
feel they are humiliated, and being portrayed as victims in this
conflict—similar to the often-cited past arguments concerning subjugation by
the West—they will act to defend their country. As such, the newly elected
leaders in Beijing would have little room to maneuver.
Furthermore, the rise of Chinese
nationalism as perpetuated by social media networks, as well as the
fragmentation of security-related decision-makers on the South China Sea, have
limited the liberal policy options that China could initiate.
Both sides urgently need to
seriously work out their differences to ensure that they are on the same page.
Otherwise, the ongoing tit-for-tat in the past several months, heightened
during the past week, could one day generate damning misunderstandings that
could lead to a conflict that nobody wants.
Indeed, ASEAN and China cannot
afford to come to that kind of apocalyptic end-game, as it would be a lose-lose
scenario.
Kavi Chongkittavorn
Business & Investment Opportunities Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Health care and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN 's area. We are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, if any request, please, contact directly Dr Christian SIODMAK, business strategist, owner and CEO of SBC at christian.siodmak@gmail.com. Many thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment