There
are two crises in America, both of which have a profound effect on the
economy. The cost of healthcare is
eating away at our ability to finance other needy areas.
Poor performance of our educational system is weakening
our international competitiveness. Both healthcare and education are at the
precipice of complete collapse. They
both deliver glaringly inferior results with prohibitive expenditures.
The performance of our healthcare system
relative to other developed countries was abysmal when examined from multiple
perspectives, while spending nearly twice that of the country with second
highest per capita cost. This was
well-documented in a recently published Commonwealth Fund study, which was the
subject of a past feature by this writer.
The education system in this country is
analogous. We spend again magnitudes
more than the countries with the highest performing students, yet the United
States is ranked 14th out of 34 other OECD (Office for Economic Co-operation
and Development) studied countries for reading skills, 17th for science and a
below average 25th for mathematics in a recent report.
Only eight countries have a lower high school
graduation rate than the US. So why are
the similarities of these two important facets of our society so
important? I believe that it is because
the solution to both must be to rethink processes and their evaluation in very
fundamental terms.
There are stakeholders in both areas that have
competing interests in such change.
Physician and hospitals are skeptical that radical change would decrease
reimbursements. This is seen in the
debate over accountable care organizations.
Medical device and pharmaceutical companies
are afraid of radical changes in purchasing models. The insurance industry is
already running for the hills in many respects, threatening that there won’t be
resources to cover people if reform comes.
In education, teachers unions are afraid of
losing their grip on members who have been shielded with tenure in the ‘Last
in,
First Out’ mode of layoffs where newer,
sometimes better and more needed teachers are let go in budget crunches first,
over less competent (sometimes already severely disciplined) established
teachers.
Students and their families might be upset if
reform brings a longer school day and perhaps school year. The powerful
standardized testing industry might no longer be the holy grail of measurement
of success.
Both medicine and educational systems are
mired in historical tradition. The
training of physicians, teachers, and students has not substantially changed
for the good part of a century.
Admittedly simplistically, benchmarks of
success of medicine are the financial profits of hospitals (albeit small that
they are today), and the eradication of a symptom or treatment of a
disease. Those of education are
graduation rates and standardized test results.
I believe that both fall significantly short
of their potentials. Medicine needs to
address preventive care and fitness, as well as treating diseases more
efficiently and cheaper.
Education needs to aim for creating an
atmosphere where students that do well because of their desire to learn and
enthusiastic well-qualified teachers motivate them. Engagement is something that both patients
and students need for healthcare and education to succeed.
It will be the key to success of mHealth as
well as a new paradigm for education. Healthcare is not brought to a patient
and information cannot be spoon-fed. It
must be the individual, whether an obese person, or an inner city pupil, that
must be engaged and motivated with adequate guidance and support from
healthcare providers and teachers respectively.
I usually write about wireless technologies
which are patient-centric and will result in lower cost of better care
delivery. Similarly, the cost of motivating a student comes at a lower price
than the resources harnessed to enforce the ‘No child Left Behind’ test-focused
outcome legislation.
Technology may be an important key to both the
medicine and educational crises.
Wireless technologies have already been seen to result in better
outcomes utilizing fewer resources in such diseases as diabetes. One example in
education is computerized program called the Khan Academy, utilized in the
classroom along with the teacher, which shows promise in captivating the
attention and improving learning.
Let engagement of both the patient and student
become the paramount goal and success will follow. The voices of forward thinking leaders and a
commitment to improvement are needed. There will be pain points on both fronts,
but it won’t be as painful as the embarrassment of being a financially poorer
country with third world services.
DAVID LEE SCHER, MD
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment