The anti-austerity wave that has crashed onto
Europe after the last round of national and local elections has brought back to
the fore the age-old face-off between the Keynesian socio-economic engineering
and its Hayekian nemesis.
However,
while the two opposing camps are bickering over the best recipe to save the Old
Continent from the crisis, the European Union is progressively giving up
geopolitical qualities that were worth emulating.
While
the ghosts of new, dramatic elections are haunting Greece, European electors
keep on slapping incumbent governments and traditional political forces backing
the austerity policies conceived by the European Union (EU) and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) to tackle the sovereign debt crisis.
Yet,
the winning front in this electoral spring across Europe appears to be
extremely incoherent, since it is made up of both pro-EU and Euro-skeptic
political forces which have in common only the aversion to the line of
financial rigor embodied by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the former
French President Nicholas Sarkozy. In France, the country's new president
Francois Hollande (Socialist Party), will have to take into account the strong
showing of Marine Le Pen (leader of the far-right National Front) in the first
round of the presidential vote. Greek parliamentary elections saw the surge of
parties rejecting the conditions of the second international bailout - devised
to ward off the threat of a country's default - and the success of the neo-Nazi
Golden Dawn (which asks for the border with Turkey to be mined against the flow
of illegal immigrants into the country, just to make things clear).
Then,
there have been the exploits of the anti-establishment forces: the Pirates
Party in Germany's state ballots and the Five Stars Movement in Italy's local
voting. Let alone the Conservative Party's debacle in the British local
elections in favor of the Labour Party.
The
strong point of both Hollande and Hannelore Kraft - the SPD leader in North
Rhine-Westphalia - is the emphasis on the economic growth and the public
spending. Hollande aims at renegotiating some terms of the EU's Fiscal Compact,
the pact imposing stricter controls on the budget of 25 European countries
(United Kingdom and the Czech Republic refused to sign it) . However, the rise
of a new paradigm that overcomes the policy of budget austerity is hampered by
the shortage of adequate resources.
Implementing
expansionary actions in Europe is a hard task, since most of EU countries
already find themselves in an uncomfortable position, faced with mammoth and
expensive administrative bodies - both at national and local level - which
account for a huge share of their public spending. And even
"rigorous" Germany is not exempt from these troubles, as it faces a
domestic dilemma: whether or not to bailout its debt-ridden local communities.
In this
regard, disciples of John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich von Hayek are lining up
again on the European field, with pro-growth Keynesians advocating more public
intervention into economy and Hayekian supporter of rigor calling for much
slimmer governments.
In the
aftermath of the presidential election in France, the European Commission
President Jose Manuel Durao Barroso declared that the logic of stimulating
growth through deficit-spending was completely irresponsible.
In the
opinion of Barroso, the way forward for the EU was to launch "projects
bonds" (eurobonds), by seeking long-term private investments to fund the
European infrastructural programs, and increase the lending capacity of the
European Investment Bank.
Such a
position is backed by Hollande but is dismissed by Merkel, who see as
unsustainable plans to boost economy by the emission of eurobonds and the like.
The simmering French-German rift on this issue is going to be at the center of
an informal European Council on May 23.
In the
meantime, in the desperate search for matching rigor and growth, von Hayek and
Keynes, pundits continue to elaborate new solutions without realizing that
their financial alchemy is often overtaken by events. For instance, talking to
Reuters on May 8, Liaquat Ahamed stated that "the only way to make Europe
competitive again is to let prices rise in the north and wages fall in the
south".
The
perspective of a two-speed Europe as envisaged by the Pulitzer Prize-winner is
indeed out-of-date. The EU's Mediterranean countries are already grappling with
plummeting wages. In Italy, where the crisis has provoked a spate of suicides
among unemployed workers as much as indebted small entrepreneurs, the gap
between salaries and prices is widening to levels last experienced back in 1995
(well before the euro's introduction). And in Spain the situation is quite the
same, if not worse than in Italy.
The
middle-classes of southern Europe are dramatically impoverishing. This dynamic
is poised to tear down the social cohesion within the affected countries as
well as within the EU as a whole. Paradoxically, in some respects the EU of
today is looking ever more like the emerging countries towards which it should
appear as a model of political and economic integration.
Under
the terms of the Plan of Action to strengthen from 2013 to 2017 the enhanced
partnership between the EU and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN), Brussels will support the ASEAN's economic integration and assist its
efforts to achieve the free flow of goods among the 10 state members.
However,
it is difficult to think of a European Union that continues to be a model for
ASEAN countries while it is itself intent on replicating the labor structure of
these nations, characterized by low wages, tough conditions of work and the
lack of social security's systems (since the end of World War II, social
security has traditionally featured Europe's market economy).
United
States relies on the military power to build credible diplomatic and trade
policies, and that is in Asia as in the rest of the world. On the other hand,
there has been just one geopolitical "weapon" that Europe could have
wielded since the end of the Cold War: its ability to induce a spirit of emulation
among those developing countries sensitive to supranational integration's
prospects. A popgun according to many. In reality the quality that has defined
the Old Europe's strategic identity until now.
Emanuele
Scimia
Asia
Times
Emanuele
Scimia is a journalist and geopolitical analyst based in Rome.
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
No comments:
Post a Comment