IN the minds of the
economic architects of Asean in 2006 as they sat around the table crafting the economic
future of the grouping, 2015 would see a region that would be economically
integrated.
Translation: the free movement of goods and services; and
an even freer movement of capital and talents among the 10 member states.
Fast-forward six years and questions remain. In 2012 we
see concerns over the eurozone and the future of European Community. Folks now
question the viability of the Asean Economic Community (AEC). Is the AEC a good
idea after all? Pronouncements have been made. A lot of effort has gone into
breaking down trade and investment barriers among the 10 member states. With so
much water under the bridge, is the AEC a face-saving fait accompli?
Given the range in economic development, diverse
political and economic systems and cultural differences, can Asean be moulded
into a community? Should we try to force the formation of the community or
should we allow it to evolve organically? These are just some of the questions
the regional grouping must grapple with as 2015 begins to dawn upon us.
In 2006, when the proposal to push for the realisation of
the AEC by 2015 was mooted, it made economic sense. We had just come out of a
major economic crisis, and initiatives towards the Asean Free Trade Area (FTA)
were well on the way. We were looking forward to the next steps towards deeper
economic integration. So we drew up the AEC blueprint as the guiding framework.
And the AEC scorecard to ensure that we did what we said we were going to do.
And in all fairness, we have worked tirelessly to ensure that implementation
was on track.
But Asean was also pragmatic in its approach to economic
integration. Right at the outset, it was clear that the grouping was not
looking to be a Customs union. That would evolve with time. Because of the
differing economic and political systems as well as differing levels of
economic development, the grouping adopted an open regionalism approach. This
would mean that regional economic integration would not be a drag on the growth
plans of the member states. Rather they took the “rising tide” stance; a
“prosper thy neighbour” attitude as they addressed the development gaps among
member states.
This approach has panned out successfully for the
grouping. It has contributed positively to the region's economic growth and
industrial development. Intra-regional trade continues to grow and now amounts
to 25% of the groupings' global trade of US$2.1 trillion. Its share of global
FDI is also up, increasing from 2.8% in 2008 to 4% in 2010 to total US$75.8bil.
More importantly, about 50% of FDI inflows into Asean are in the services
sectors. And Asean has been growing over 5% per annum in recent years.
Impressive? Perhaps. The challenge is whether Asean can
continue to retain its attractiveness and sustain growth and continue to remain
dynamic. The economic pressures brought on by global economic uncertainties are
putting a strain on efforts towards regional economic integration. Member
states must resist the pressures of protectionism. Short-term relief will not
augur well for the long-term benefits of the region.
Even as Asean works to ensure we get to our goals, there
is no standing still. The year 2015 is just another milestone. The grouping
must look beyond 2015. Enter the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership
agreement (RCEP). If implemented, the RCEP will see the deeper integration of
Asean with its FTA partners China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New
Zealand. Ambitious? Not really when one considers the fact that the FTAs with
these partners are pretty much in place. The challenge is of course putting the
pieces together to optimally benefit all parties. An integrated FTA of 16
countries if realised will be a huge market of its own representing 47% of the
global population and over 40% of global trade.
But a prerequisite of RCEP is the full and effective
implementation of the AEC.
On the AEC: it is now in its third (2012-2013) of its
four phases of implementation. To date, close to 70% of the AEC measures under
phases one and two have been completed. This is commendable. But the more
difficult tasks are still ahead as the grouping confronts the liberalisation of
the sensitive sectors in trade, investment and services as well as in economic
sectors such as transport, agriculture, tourism and finance. There is the
challenge of compliance (doing what we say we will do) and the challenge of
impact (getting the outcomes we said we would). With slightly more than three
years towards 2015, the heat is on.
Dr Rebecca Fatima Sta Maria
Datuk Dr Rebecca Fatima Sta Maria is the International
Trade and Industry Ministry secretary-general.
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
No comments:
Post a Comment