KYOTO — The fury unleashed between China and Japan over the past few weeks has
cast a long shadow over peace and stability in the northeast Asian region and
beyond. At first glance, the conflict was interpreted as purely an act of
patriotism, particularly on the part of China.
Recently a fishing boat filled
with Hong Kong activists determined to proclaim China's sovereignty over the
contested Senkaku Islands (known in China as the Diaoyus) finally claimed
success after landing on the islands' shores. But soon they were arrested and
deported by the Japanese authorities.
Simultaneously, massive
anti-Japanese rallies in various parts of China were organized, marking yet
another low point in their relations. The bilateral conflict has also been
exacerbated by historical baggage. Japan has been consistently accused by China
of glossing over the country's wartime atrocities by allowing key government
figures to visit the controversial Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo.
For some, territorial disputes
and history are not the only burdens in Sino-Japanese relations. The list of
issues plaguing bilateral ties ranges from gas drilling in disputed areas of
the East China Sea to the differences of opinion and, more importantly, in
tactics for dealing with the North Korean nuclear program. Japan is of the
impression that China, as chair of the six-party talks, has not acted in its
relations with North Korea as Japan would have expected it to do.
In looking closely, however, the
real debate is not about Japan's militaristic past or territorial disputes or a
failure to whitewash the old curses.
At the heart of the problem lies
the question of which, Japan or China, will emerge as the dominant Asian power
in the new century. Japanese ambivalence to China's peaceful rise is becoming
more apparent as the level of political, military and economic competition
between the two countries intensifies.
Japan is apprehensive about the
prospect of being replaced by China as the manufacturing hub of Asia, and of
losing its dominance in the Southeast Asian economic sphere in the wake of
Chinese free trade agreements (FTAs).
At this complicated crossroads,
the Sino-Japanese power struggle has been carefully factored into Southeast
Asia's strategic calculations, given that conflict between the two countries is
potentially detrimental to stability and development throughout Asia.
Can this shift in regional order
be transformed into a political and economic boon for Southeast Asia?
In particular, the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations depends on the region's reactions and policy options,
which by necessity must be equally compatible with Chinese and Japanese
interests.
So far, ASEAN's relations with
Japan and China have been kept amicably on track. Japan was one of the first
nations to dispatch volunteers for the rescue mission to and the reconstruction
of areas devastated by the tsunami in Southeast Asia nearly eight years ago. In
recent years, increasing trade between ASEAN and Japan has not only lifted
relations to a higher level and contributed toward starting FTA negotiations,
but also signaled Tokyo's aspiration to pursue a bigger political role in
Southeast Asia.
Meanwhile, on the bright side,
ASEAN and China are enjoying the fruits of their FTA, which has produced
double-digit growth in bilateral trade. Some ASEAN members feel comfortable
with China's rise, such as Thailand, Laos and Cambodia, and believe that it
deserves their positive response. But the conflict in the South China Sea
between some ASEAN members and China may derail the organization's attempt to
consolidate its ties with Beijing.
In light of the Sino-Japanese
conflict, ASEAN's role and responses have appeared to be constrained by its
intimate relations with both powers.
ASEAN has assiduously sought to
moderate these tensions while giving both Japan and China greater room to
maneuver so that they feel less victimized by each other. ASEAN has a myriad of
appropriate platforms for China and Japan to maintain their dialogue. Despite
numerous constraints and its own issues with China in the South China Sea,
ASEAN is therefore in an advantageous position in the conflict between China
and Japan.
From an economic perspective,
intense Sino-Japanese friction has already benefited other regional players.
Taiwan's manufacturers are eager to expand their market share in China and fill
the gap that would exist if nationalist Chinese consumers decide to boycott
brand-name and high-quality Japanese products.
Likewise, the Sino-Japanese
standoff could benefit ASEAN manufacturers if Japanese investors relocate their
production bases from China to Southeast Asia. More benefits could be rendered
to ASEAN's booming tourism industry. Safety concerns among Japanese tourists in
China will drive them to friendlier destinations like Thailand, Indonesia and
Vietnam.
All of these economic rewards
appear attractive for ASEAN, but only in the short run. It would be regrettable
if China and Japan move further toward physical conflict, which would leave
Asia more vulnerable and in a weakened state.
The opportunity for Southeast
Asia is to take up the diplomatic challenge whereby smaller states can
effectively enlarge their role in peacemaking between Asia's two rivals.
Available forums in the region, such as ASEAN-plus-three and the East Asia
Summit, could provide the venue for China and Japan to set aside their
political and historical differences and focus more on developing friendship,
for their own sake and that of the region.
China will end up struggling in
its economic development under the present hostile environment. Japan's greater
political role will fail at the outset without Chinese support. At this
juncture, ASEAN's international standing could reach new heights by helping to
facilitate dialogue between China and Japan.
Pavin Chachavalpongpun
Pavin Chachavalpongpun is associate professor at Kyoto University's
Center for Southeast Asian Studies.
Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com
No comments:
Post a Comment