Despite recent reforms, Burma was again listed as one of the most
corrupt countries in the world in a survey by Transparency International (TI)
on Wednesday, which ranked it as the 5th-worst country in terms of public
sector corruption among 176 nations.
TI said reforms had not improved
Burma’s ranking, as new anti-corruption measures remain tentative and their
impact has yet to show up in its research.
TI’s Corruption Perception Index
2012 placed Burma at 172, just above Sudan, Afghanistan, North Korea and
Somalia—all of which are either war-torn or deeply isolated countries. Burma’s
neighbor Laos fared only somewhat better, ranking 160th, while Thailand came in
at 88.
With an index score of 15 Burma
was far below the score of 50 at which public institutions are considered
transparent. In Southeast Asia, only Singapore and Brunei scored higher than
50.
Burma moved up eight places from
the 2011 ranking, but TI said this constitutes no significant improvement as
seven countries that ranked above Burma last year were dropped in the new
index.
“Myanmar is at the very bottom
[…] which means the public sector is perceived to be extremely corrupt,” said
Samantha Grant, Southeast Asia program coordinator at the Berlin-based
organization.
Burma has corruption “issues
across many public sector institutions,” Grant told The Irrawaddy, adding that
TI was only beginning to understand the full depth of these issues as the
country opens up.
Burma’s reform process has not
impacted the 2012 corruption ranking, she said, as some of the information for
the survey was collected two years ago. Grant added that it would also take a
while for the new anti-corruption measures to change the perception of public
sector corruption among business professionals. Their opinions inform TI’s
corruption ranking.
Recent anti-corruption measures
include a requirement for ministers and officials appointed by President Thein
Sein to declare their financial assets and interests, while the Lower House
approved a committee with the power to investigate corruption in the judicial
system.
The government has also begun
drafting a new Anti-Corruption Law to replace the 1948 Suppression of
Corruption Act, according to an announcement by the Home Affairs Ministry in
the state-run newspaper The New Light of Myanmar on Nov. 30.
The ministry said bribery
persisted in Burma’s public and private sector and called the practice “an
unacceptable and unpardonable misconduct.” It appealed to citizens to report
corruption anonymously to its head office or to the director-general of the
Bureau of Special Investigation.
Grant said TI was encouraged by
such steps but urged the government to show the political will to fully implement
the Anti-Corruption Law and create strong, independent institutions that could
investigate corruption.
The Anti-Corruption Law “is
potentially a step in the right direction but whether or not it actually is
will depend very much on the quality of the law itself—and on effective
implementation,” Grant said, adding that Burma’s Parliament also needs to
ratify the UN Convention Against Corruption. She warned that many Southeast
Asian have good anti-corruption laws in place that are never fully implemented.
Burma has long been plagued by
public sector corruption on all levels, ranging from citizens paying for basic
services to massive losses of revenues generated from the exploitation of
Burma’s vast natural resources, such as timber, gemstones, oil, coal and gas.
Under the military regime, these
revenues were siphoned off by the country’s military, political elite and their
cronies, leaving the government unable to provide services and build
infrastructure for its impoverished population.
“The exploitation of Burma’s
natural resources has been heavily impacted upon by corruption,” said Sean
Turnell, an economics professor at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
“The bounty these should provide has been hitherto denied to the people of
Burma.”
Turnell said, however, that the
government’s attitude towards corruption has begun to change.
“I think the current government
recognizes the damage that corruption can impose upon their efforts to turn
Burma’s economy around,” he said, adding that corruption posed a major
stumbling block for Western investors, such oil companies, which are bound by
strict anti-corruption rules in their home countries.
According to Turnell, Burma
should battle corruption by lifting the numerous restrictions on economic
activities that have long been in place as these provide officials with
opportunities to demand bribes. “[A]dopt a policy as ‘liberal’ as possible, and
remove the means by which corruption can be extracted,” he advised.
The Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS), an influential Washington-based think-tank,
visited Burma in August and said it observed a sea change in attitudes towards
in corruption in the country.
“Business executives say that
President Thein Sein seems to have decided not to punish former
cronies/proxies, but these corrupt businessmen appear to have lost most of
their former privileges as the president has moved to level the playing field
[…] Ministers feel they cannot have any dealings with cronies out of fear they
could face charges of corruption,” a CSIS report said.
Business & Investment Opportunities
Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Health care and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN 's area. We are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, if any request, please, contact directly Dr Christian SIODMAK, business strategist, owner and CEO of SBC at christian.siodmak@gmail.com. Many thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment