Abe government gives America's trade pact a boost
One of the least noticed but in
the long term probably more important results of the change in leadership in
Japan is the boost it has given to the prospects of the nation joining
America's Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
New Prime Minister Shinzo Abe may
have been disappointed with the tone of US support for Japan vis a vis China on
the Senkakus during his recent visit to Washington, but he did get assurances
on TPP which enable him to pursue it.
Japan has for long been in two
minds about the TPP for reasons to do both with a desire not to be seen to be
too closely allied with Washington to appease both domestic critics and China,
and the long-held fears of protected sectors such as agriculture and some
services that benefit from regulatory procedures which deter competition.
Abe's promise of radical moves to
lift Japan out of its economic rut now clearly include the TPP in addition to
monetary easing and structural reforms to spur competition. Previously he was
in favor of joining the trade pact only if it did not involve elimination of
agricultural tariffs on entry. Now he can claim that any elimination would be
gradual.
Even in Japan itself popular
opinion seems to have shifted in favor of the TPP, sensing that it may help
give the economy a badly-needed boost and help it fend off Chinese competition
in North American and east Asian markets. Big business is also now supportive.
The rural vote is declining slowly and Japan is sending the message that it
needs to respond to its aging population with new initiatives to raise
productivity.
At the same time, the US badly
needs to give the TPP the momentum that only Japan can provide. A TPP confined
to small and middling countries such as Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam would
have scant impact. It would certainly not act as a counterweight to China's
well-advanced efforts to sew up Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with the Asean nations.
But Japan's participation would be an even more important economic deal than
the US FTA with South Korea, which is now a year old, having been held up for
long by political opposition, especially in the doltish US Congress.
The TPP itself is anyway a work
in progress which is very ambitious, going beyond the scope of FTAs, not only
aiming to tackle the difficult issues which are sometimes omitted from FTAs
into broader issues involving services, investment codes and more. There is no
guaranteeing that the US itself is as open as its likes to think and
automobiles for instance are still a sensitive issue.
However, if the US is serious
about its "pivot" to Asia and if Japan is serious about reform and
making itself more competitive, it makes sense for both sides to push TPP.
There is a also a wider feeling in Asia that the US economy is a lot more
flexible and competitive than had been assumed after years of mammoth trade
deficits followed by the real estate and banking boom and bust. Also too there
is a sense that Japan may, at least for the next few years, have bottomed out
while China has topped out and now faces years of relatively modest growth and
a possibly unstable financial environment.
Of course the sheer size of
Japan's economy and the complexity of issues could put a brake on the whole TPP
process. But a TPP which has no major economic actor other than the US is
unlikely to be attractive to others. Japan's eager involvement would also put
pressure on countries, especially Thailand, which are reluctant to irritate
China but for whom the Japanese corporate presence remains far more important
overall than that of China.
For sure Japan's vested
interests, conspicuously well represented in Abe's own party, will fight to
preserve themselves. The political support for Abe may prove as short-lived as
that of his many predecessors. The US may well be diverted from its Asian
agenda by other issues such as Israel's lock on its Mideast policies, or simply
by a rise in the isolationist sentiment now evident in some quarters of the
Republican Party.
But both nations not only need a
strategic alliance at multiple levels, they need to stand together - and with
the EU - to protect the rules-based international trading system from ad hoc
arrangements of convenience by others including China and India who often
appear to see trade in 18th century mercantilist terms.
Business & Investment Opportunities
Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Health care and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN 's area. We are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, if any request, please, contact directly Dr Christian SIODMAK, business strategist, owner and CEO of SBC at christian.siodmak@gmail.com. Many thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment