Showing posts with label Inequality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inequality. Show all posts

Jun 8, 2012

North Korea - In autocratic NKorea, inequality assigned at birth

Follow Me on Pinterest
WASHINGTON (AP) — In the supposed workers’ paradise of North Korea, inequality is assigned at birth, a study by a U.S.-based human rights group says.

Education, job, access to scarce food and health care, and even whom you marry all hinge on how loyal your ancestors are viewed to have been to the Kim dynasty that took power six decades ago.

The study released Wednesday by the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea says all adults in the socialist state are categorized as one of three classes: loyal, wavering or hostile.

The nongovernment human rights group says it amounts to a caste system.

Despite the emergence of informal markets since the late 1990s challenging state control, the study says the class system persists and is behind the discrimination and abuses faced by the lowest echelons of the North’s closed society.

“Throughout its 64-year existence, the Kim regime has claimed that North Korea is an egalitarian workers’ paradise,” said the committee’s executive director, Greg Scarlatoiu. “Yet, inequality is assigned at birth, perpetuated throughout a person’s lifetime and cruelly enforced by those in power to benefit themselves and their supporters.”

The North Korean government denies such a discriminatory class system exists.

The study, titled “Marked for Life,” is based on interviews with 75 North Korean defectors, including as recently as 2011. It also cites a 1993 manual issued by North Korea’s Ministry of Public Security to guide its officials on how to investigate a citizen’s socio-political classification, or “songbun,” which translates in Korean as “ingredients.”

Lee Sung-min, a North Korean defector living in Seoul, said in an interview with The Associated Press that because his late grandfather was accused of collaborating with the Japanese during the 35 years Japan ruled South Korea as a colony, his family was stigmatized by North Korean authorities and he was blocked from joining the Workers’ Party or entering the school he wanted to attend.

“No one is free from songbun in North Korea,” Lee said.

The study says the ministry maintains a file on everyone from the age of 17 that is updated every two years.

Numerous defectors’ interviews show that those who are young when they leave North Korea see songbun as decreasingly important, while older defectors say songbun still matters, the report said.

The songbun system has its origins in social class restructuring enforced by the North’s communist founders, led by Kim Il Sung, that began even before the state’s formal creation in 1948, to elevate peasants and laborers at the expense of landlords, businessmen and religious leaders.

Those considered most loyal had fought alongside Kim against Japanese colonialists and then against U.S.-backed forces in the 1950-53 Korean War. Those deemed hostile collaborated with the enemy or had family members who fled to South Korea.

Moving up a songbun category is rare and requires a lifetime of devotion to the Kim family regime and ruling Workers’ Party of Korea. But songbun can be downgraded for political or criminal offenses or failing to cooperate with authorities.

When an individual is sentenced to the North’s gulag of political prison camps — estimated to hold 150,000-200,000 people — family members are considered guilty by association and generally accompany them, the study says.

Today the loyal class, which makes up about a quarter of the 24 million population, still dominates the powerful military and the Workers’ Party. They alone are entitled to live in the relatively prosperous capital Pyongyang and monopolize the prestige universities and best jobs, the study says.

Marrying someone with poor songbun likely would exclude that individual from party membership, causing severe consequences for employment opportunities and quality of life, it says.

Many in the hostile class inhabit the most impoverished northeastern provinces, often in isolated mountain villages where they perform hard labor at mines and farms. They have been most vulnerable to failures since the 1990s in North Korea’s public food distribution system and resulting malnutrition.

Roberta Cohen, co-chairman of the rights group, says money, bribery and corruption recently have begun to erode the songbun system because of the emergence of informal markets and the scope for paying officials for favors. But she said songbun’s main elements remain in place, “guaranteed by a complete absence of political freedom.”

The study says a slang has developed around the songbun system, wherein the loyal class are referred to as “tomatoes” that are red on both the inside and outside, so are good socialists. Those of the wavering class are “apples” that are only red on the outside, and the hostile class is known as “grapes” — considered politically unredeemable.

There’s no sign that new ruler Kim Jong Un, the third in the dynasty, will change the policy. The study concludes that would be a direct threat to the North Korean elite and could undermine his consolidation of power.


Business & Investment Opportunities 
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programmes. Many thanks for visiting www.yourvietnamexpert.com and/or contacting us at contact@yourvietnamexpert.com

Nov 9, 2011

Singapore - Growing income inequality Down Under



In the early 1960s, when Australian author Donald Horne temporarily set aside his trenchant criticisms of the national psychology to remark that Australia was "one of the most evenly prosperous societies in the world", few citizens were inclined to disagree. After all, Australians have long believed that they live in an egalitarian society.

Today, however, many are not quite so sure. The Occupy Wall Street protests have struck a sympathetic chord in Australia, with demonstrators following the lead of their United States counterparts by setting up temporary campsites in the business districts of cities across the nation. The development is particularly striking, given that the Australian economy has continued to grow well despite the global economic downturn.

"The evidence is mounting of a growing divide, with more people hitting hard times and falling into poverty," Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie told the media late last month.

According to the council, there are now about 2.2 million Australians - about 11 per cent of the population - living in poverty. This compares to just 8 per cent of the population in 1994. The richest 20 per cent hold 62 per cent of the nation's wealth - an average net worth of A$2.2 million (US$2.27 million) - while the poorest 20 per cent, with just 1 per cent of national wealth, have an average net worth of just A$32,000.

A lack of relevant statistics makes it difficult to say exactly how income equality has changed over the course of Australian history. Even so, most economists believe that there was a substantial long-term decline in inequality between the 1940s and the 1970s.

After the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) began publishing the results of its regular surveys on household income in 1981, however, a different trend has emerged. Take the Gini coefficient, a widely accepted measure of income inequality. ABS statistics show that Australia's Gini rose to 0.33 from 2009 to last year. This compares to just 0.27 from 1981 to 1982. In other words, income inequality has grown worse during the period. A value of 0 represents absolute equality and 1 absolute inequality.

A rise in housing prices has added to the public disquiet. "The great Australian dream (of owning a home) is definitely on the way out," CEO John Edwards of housing information research provider Residex told the media last month. A recent survey found that close to half of 20- to 49-year-olds believe that getting a foot on the property ladder is now "somewhat" or "completely" unrealistic.

Decades of home price increases have pushed the median dwelling price in Australia to 12 times the median annual household income, well above what is considered affordable. According to Macquarie Bank senior economist Brian Redican, the average income in Australia is between A$55,000 to A$60,000. But the median income, the mid-point in the range, is about A$35,000. Home price research group RP Data-Rismark says that the national median home price was A$450,000 at the beginning of this year.

Home rental costs are also rising. According to Australians for Affordable Housing (AAH), about 100,000 households in Sydney are facing poverty because of the high cost of renting.

Meanwhile, job insecurity is adding to the public disquiet. Trade union leaders say that the number of casual workers, who are not eligible for sick pay or guaranteed incomes, has almost doubled in the last 25 years.

Recent developments have also begun to exacerbate differences between the states. Economists now talk about a "two-speed" or "three-speed" economy, as the mining boom boosts the West Australian economy while growth in the eastern states slows. New South Wales, once the strongest of all, now appears to be the weakest.

The gap between industrial sectors is also widening. High commodity prices have driven up the exchange rate, eroding the competitiveness of sectors such as manufacturing, tourism and export-oriented education. The retail sector is also weak. Construction, on the other hand, is going strong, thanks partly to the mining boom and partly to rebuilding in Queensland in the wake of the natural disasters there earlier in the year.

How can this situation be changed? Australian policymakers have little control over international economic trends, but they may be able to find ways of tweaking domestic policies.

A close look at the Gini coefficient over the past 30 years shows that, despite the long-term trend, there were brief periods when the degree of inequality actually fell. Studying these developments may give policymakers some ideas about how future policies might be formulated.

Meanwhile, the nation's politicians might like to draw on Singapore's experience and focus on housing. AAH spokesman Sarah Toohey put it well: "A secure home is a fundamental building block for everything else we do in life."

Bruce Gale
The Straits Times



Business & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.