Sep 25, 2012

Indonesia - Indonesia’s Chairmanship of APEC Will Be Chance to Lead by Example

Follow Me on Pinterest
As Indonesia takes over the chairmanship of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum from Russia next year, here is a chance for one of the region’s biggest developmental success stories to lead by example.

However, despite its achievements so far, Indonesia should improve its trade and investment environment before it can really chart the way for the 21-member grouping. Only then can it can make sure that the 2013 APEC Summit will be more than a photo op where leaders make sweeping declarations and empty promises.

APEC in the past has done well in formulating ambitious visions. The last time Indonesia was chair in 1994, APEC leaders set forth the so-called “Bogor Goals.” These stipulated that developed nations should achieve free and open investment by 2010, and developing nations by 2020. Eighteen years later, a lot of work has been done, but much more lies ahead. In fact, it would not be realistic at this point to expect the Bogor Goals to be achieved in just eight years’ time. Such goals should, instead, be seen as just one part of an overall vision that keeps driving us forward.

Indonesia’s ascension to the chairmanship comes midway between the 2010 assessment of the Bogor Goals and the next assessment in 2015. This gives Indonesia’s leaders the opportunity to help create a more far-reaching vision that goes beyond the Goals and which should focus on APEC’s long-term growth strategy.

By pushing forward the growth agenda, Indonesia’s leaders can enhance their prominence both at home and abroad. They should, however, provide examples of local success stories to showcase at the 2013 Summit. And they can.

Six strategies would be particularly fruitful and can be implemented through Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) ahead of the summit.

First, infrastructure development as an application of the APEC Public-Private Dialogue. Indonesia’s own PPP Scheme can be developed further, especially under the Master Plan for the Acceleration and Expansion of Indonesian Economic Growth (MP3EI).

Second, promoting small to medium enterprises (SMEs) and developing entrepreneurship. SMEs and entrepreneurs are important to the APEC economy as a source of innovation and employment. Indonesia should emphasize regional cooperation to break down trade barriers and boost financial development and quality improvements in education.

Third, encouraging tourism. Indonesian tourism is an underperforming sector with large untapped potential. Jakarta has much to gain from reinforcing the 2010 Nara Declaration on strengthening APEC tourism cooperation.

Fourth, encouraging private investment in green technology. Events such as the Green Investment Summit Indonesia offer plenty of opportunity to shine a good light on Indonesia’s efforts at dealing with climate change.

Fifth, promotion of sustainable management of resources and agriculture. While President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s Rio+20 speech already put the spotlight on the “Blue Economy” of marine resources, Indonesia must keep up its efforts to protect forests and other resources.

Sixth, improving its counter-terrorism profile. Given Indonesia’s history and recent rise in religious radicalism, a strong policy push for more counter-terrorism efforts would signal Jakarta’s commitment.

These are all issues of primarily domestic concern, but the geopolitical environment also offers plenty of opportunities for Indonesia to present itself as a regional leader.

China is aggressively changing its role. Its rising assertions in the region have come at the expense of cooperation between the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the G-3 (the United States, Europe and Japan). Due to friction over territorial disputes in the South China Sea, the July 2012 Asean Summit failed for the first time in the association’s history to issue a joint communique.

At the same time, increasing Sino-Asean trade threatens America’s economic position in the region. European financial woes have led to expanding Chinese influence not just in Asia — but globally. But as China and the United States continue to grapple for influence in Asia, Jakarta can take advantage from the fact that both the Chinese and the Americans will try to win Indonesia over, and will likely do so through defense cooperation. However, it would be wise for Indonesia to avoid taking a firm stance in support of one or the other, as that would be detrimental to its strategic interests.

Meanwhile, China is slowly transforming from exporter to importer of Asian goods. As wages and costs rise, its one-child policy is taking its toll on the working population. This changes China’s competitive advantage compared to populous countries with a younger work force, such as Indonesia and India.

In all, Indonesia has vast potential to succeed on the global stage, both in terms of trade and politics. It is the fourth-most populous country in the world. Its large consumer base allows domestic demand-led growth and increasing resilience to external shocks. Sustained improvements have been made in Indonesia’s fundamentals, including sound fiscal and monetary policies.

Indonesia’s successes have so far been recognized in its inclusion in the G-20 and the upgrade of its debt rating to investment grade by Moody’s and Fitch. Recent projections by consulting firm McKinsey show Indonesia becoming the seventh-largest economy by 2030. Standard Chartered even projects it to be in sixth place.

Leading APEC again will be an important stepping stone for Indonesia to build confidence and show it is a key player on the international stage. Indonesia has already accomplished much to become one of today’s emerging-market stars. But it must not rest on its laurels — success should motivate it to work harder.

Indonesia has done well to come this far. But it is essential to ensure that improvements will continue and that vested interests do not get in the way of an even brighter future. Complacency should not be allowed to sink in and the 1997 Asian financial crisis should serve as a stark reminder of what can go wrong.

The Bogor Goals have become synonymous with APEC’s trade and investment agenda ever since they were set forth in 1994. The 21st century is bringing many other challenges, from human resource development to sustainable growth. The year 2013 will be the moment for Indonesia to once again help APEC reach a historic milestone.

Ann Marie Eu

Ann Marie Eu is an analyst with Pereira International, a Singapore-based political consulting company.



Business & Investment Opportunities 
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Strategy, Investment and Management, focusing Healthcare and Life Science with expertise in ASEAN. Since we are currently changing the platform of www.yourvietnamexpert.com, you may contact us at: sbc.pte@gmail.com, provisionally. Many thanks.

No comments:

Post a Comment