Current crisis seems intractable until royal transition occurs
The leaders of the 100,000-odd protesters who blocked
some of Bangkok’s key intersections Sunday are said by knowledgeable political
analysts to be deeply involved in not just a battle for political primacy but
for control of the looming succession of the country’s monarchy.
Bhumibol Adulyajej, the 86-year-old king, has been
seriously ill for more than two years, spending extended periods in hospital
before regaining enough equilibrium to be moved to the summer palace in Hua Hin
nearly 200 km south of Bangkok. The forces behind fiery protest leader Suthep
Thaugsuban appear to be trying to control the succession. They have repeatedly
demanded that Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra step aside and allow a council
of elders of some kind to run the country for a year or more while vague
“reforms” are put in place.
If the king is as frail as he appears, a succession
could occur at any time. What the elites and upper classes in Bangkok – and
some of the armed forces, reportedly including Anupong Poachinda, the former
commander in chief of the Royal Thai Army – do not want is for ousted former
Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawata or his political apparatus to be in charge of
the political process when the king finally dies.
Thaksin, now in self-exile in Dubai after being
deposed by a coup in 2006, has long been regarded as a threat to the
established royalist elites, largely because he is popular and created a power
base not completely beholden to the entrenched establishment. A onetime
policeman in the northern city of Chiangmai, he is regarded as a newly-rich
upstart, a telecom tycoon whose rise to power in 2001 set in motion a process
of trying to stop him that continues to this day.
The enormous wealth in the hands of the monarchy and
the cozy imprimatur the king bestows on the system could be upended if Thaksin
or his proxies control what will certainly be a wrenching period of mourning
once the truly revered Bumbibol passes away. The situation is made more fragile
because Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn, the presumed successor, has in the past
been regarded as close to Thaksin.
It seems virtually certain that the crown prince,
assuming he takes the throne, would begin his reign as a weak monarch unable to
command the kind of respect that his father earned over decades on the throne.
The current situation has been repeatedly described as
a class war pitting relatively poor rural northerners against Bangkok, and
there is little doubt that is exactly what it is although the Bangkok elites
behind the protests have the help of cannon fodder from the rural peasantry in
southern Thailand, a traditional stronghold of the opposition Democratic Party
and Suthep’s home region, where he and his family are power brokers and virtual
warlords in Surat Thani province.
Should a street showdown occur, which has yet to
happen, the southerners would likely be outnumbered by northerners, usually
known as red shirts, in league with Thaksin. If the current protests fail and
the Thaksin forces remain in power, the impact on Thailand’s monarchy could be
enormous, many believe.
After having lost the 2010 general election
decisively, the Democrats first reluctantly accepted having to put up with
Thaksin’s telegenic younger sister, Yingluck, and the Pheu Thai Party for the
foreseeable future. Yingluck turned out to be a surprisingly able leader,
cooling off tensions and mollifying both the palace and the military.
It appeared that the Pheu Thai government would easily
stay in command until 2015 elections since the main opposition party, the
Democrat Party, hasn’t won a majority in more than two decades and has little
of the broad appeal outside Bangkok that the Thaksin forces have. Thaksin,
however, lost patience and pushed Pheu Thai to vote through a disastrous
blanket amnesty bill that allowed the anti-Thaksin coalition to regroup and
regain its energy. That led to a crisis that is once again playing itself out
in Bangkok’s streets.
The decision on Saturday by Abhisit Vejjajiva, the
opposition leader, to boycott the snap election Yingluck has called for
February 2 sets up a potentially dangerous confrontation. Army Chief Prayuth
Chan-Ocha, in remarks last Saturday, characterized the situation as possibly
carrying the seeds of civil war.
Suthep’s People’s Democratic Reform Committee has
begun to issue its own “governmental” diktats, including issuing an arrest
warrant for Yingluck and seeking to act as an alternative authority,
heightening the danger of confrontation.
It appears that any solution is well into the future.
The King is too weak to demand a compromise as he has in past confrontations.
His traditional December 5 birthday message was almost pitiful and he nearly
didn’t finish,
In any case, democracy is now under serious threat.
Successive coups have always been marked by a return to democracy, no matter
how distorted. The clear aim of the elites, as has been reported widely, is to
forestall the near certainty that the Thaksin forces will prevail once again at
the ballot box. Thaksin remains a potent force from his exile perch in Dubai,
though it appears he badly miscalculated in pushing for the amnesty bill.
Thaksin’s longstanding populist policies like cheap
health care, microlending to stimulate economic activity in villages and a wide
range of other such measures have left his opponents unable to break his
influence despite the Democrat Party’s installation in power by the military
after 2008. Abhisit and the Democrats own attempt to replicate such populist
programs cut no Ice. Eventually discontent led to the bloody riots of 2010 when
the military cracked down on street protesters allied with Thaksin. More than
90 persons were killed and one of the city’s most upscale shopping centers was
set ablaze.
The turmoil this time appears to be an ominous sea
change from the past decade, especially in view of the King’s obvious
infirmity. His feeble birthday speech and the palace’s immediate approval of
Yingluck’s snap election plans, have been flatly ignored, as have previous
palace pronouncements including one by Prince Vajiralongkorn. Suthep’s forces
responded by ratcheting up the rhetoric and demanding Yingluck step down.
The goal of Suthep and whoever is above and behind
him, including some powerful local businessmen,
is to eradicate all influence by Thaksin, his family and his allies and
to drive them from the country, presumably following the former prime minister
into exile.. The idea that widespread corruption in politics is Suthep’s prime
motivation is difficult to stomach, given that Thai politics for decades has
been a banquet for enrichment on the part of politicians – including Suthep,
who was once kicked out of his party for steering land meant for redistribution
to the poor in his district to wealthy families among his backers.
Yingluck’s December 9 decision to dissolve parliament
did not calm the waters. Despite Prayuth’s disavowal of military action, if the
situation grows truly chaotic, the pressure will be there to act. There is also
the danger of yet another decision by the judiciary against the Thaksin forces,
perhaps to void the election. That would leave the vacuum Suthep and his backers
presumably are looking for, to run the country through the passing of the king.
The issue is not whether the election will take place,
but whether it would resolve the crisis. There appears little chance of that
now that the Democrats have pulled out. If it doesn’t take place, the Pheu
Thai’s Red Shirts could once again descend on Bangkok looking for revenge. It
is hard to see any upside anywhere.
Business & Investment Opportunities
Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd (SBC) is incorporated
in Singapore since 1994.
No comments:
Post a Comment