Should
Singapore be celebrating its supporting role in a revolution that took place in
another country?
That question arose with the opening last
Saturday of the revamped Sun Yat Sen Nanyang Memorial Hall, a
villa-turned-museum named after the itinerant Chinese revolutionary leader who
stayed there on three occasions.
In a letter published yesterday in this
newspaper's Forum page, cultural historian Dr Liew Khai Khiun criticised the
museum for giving prominence to China's 1911 revolution and the support
invested in it by a group of ethnic Chinese pioneers of Singapore.
Online, critics have accused the museum of
Sinocentrism and pandering to a rising China. The memorial hall and museum is
managed by the National Heritage Board on behalf of the Singapore Chinese
Chamber of Commerce and Industry, which was in charge of the place before the
revamp.
Essentially, the debate goes back to two
questions which have haunted Singapore since independence: whether to delve
into the parts of our history originating from different lands; and if
identifying with one's ethnic heritage makes one more or less Singaporean.
One historical fact which cannot be ignored is
that Singapore was the South- east Asian base of Dr Sun's Revolutionary
Alliance. This sprawling group of intellectuals and military leaders wanted to
bring a democratic system of government to a feudal and corrupt China, planning
a slew of uprisings that eventually brought down the Qing emperors by end-1911.
Some historians would even go so far as to say
that as a relatively affluent port city where many overseas Chinese passed
through, Singapore was the most important place for Dr Sun outside of China.
Well-known historian Professor Wang Gungwu
makes this point in a video commentary at the memorial hall, located at Tai Gin
Road off Balestier Road.
I find the charges of Sinocentrism unfair
because, Dr Sun Yat Sen's name aside, the main story told by the museum is
actually that of a dynamic and socially- engaged Chinese community here at the
onset of the 20th century.
Left very much to their own devices by the
British colonial government, the business leaders of this community built
schools, hospitals and temples, and started Chinese-language newspapers.
Intellectually and emotionally, they embraced
the cause of reform in China in much the same way that some Indians here
supported India's revolutionary leader S. Chandra Bose during World War II.
Given that it was only decades later that
anyone would conceive of Singapore as a nation and their permanent home, it is
bordering on the ridiculous to distinguish between 'Singaporean' and 'foreign'
in the early 20th century.
Also, the Sun Yat Sen Nanyang Memorial Hall
must be seen in the context of two more heritage museums being developed by the
Government with help from community partners.
One is the Malay Heritage Centre in Kampong
Glam, which is undergoing redevelopment and will reopen next June. The other is
the soon-to-be-built Indian Heritage Centre in Little India, ready by December
2013.
Together, they mark the first time that
significant resources and curatorial attention have been devoted to telling the
pre-independence stories of the major ethnic communities. The National Heritage
Board has committed a total of between S$30 million (US$23 million) and S$35
million to all three institutions.
Seeing these rich and diverse histories beyond
the lens of nation-building is, to me, long overdue, and reflects a growing
maturity as a nation.
One can recall how Mr S. Rajaratnam, the first
culture minister and People's Action Party ideologue, believed Singapore's
history should start from the arrival of the British in 1819 and wanted
ethnicity and ethnic heritage to be downplayed totally.
In the 1980s and 1990s, the Government began
to pay more attention to ethnic culture as a shorthand for inculcating 'Asian
values' in the young. But such a values-based approach proved a turn-off to an
increasingly educated and sophisticated population, and also ignored the
complexities of history and culture.
For example, 'Indian culture' is really a
misnomer given the diversity of experiences of the Tamils, Gujeratis, Sikhs and
others from the Indian sub-continent. The Indian Heritage Centre, which will
begin construction next year, is expected to document the full range of stories
of the Indian community.
Going ahead, the Sun Yat Sen museum should
develop more exhibitions on the pioneers of the Chinese community.
They include Teo Eng Hock - the Peranakan
owner of the villa that hosted Dr Sun - his nephew and planter Lim Nee Soon and
medical doctor Lim Boon Keng.
Interestingly, these three supporters of the
Chinese revolutionary movement were not Chinese-educated as one might imagine,
but English-educated Peranakans with varying ability in the Chinese language.
According to Prof Wang, Dr Sun's ability to speak English won them over. The
charismatic leader was born in Guangdong but grew up in Hawaii.
Politically and ideologically, Chinese
community leaders at the time were far from united. There were those like the
literary scholar and businessman Khoo Soek Wan who backed Dr Sun's rival, Kang
Youwei. Kang championed reforms but not revolution and also visited Singapore
several times to lobby for support.
Later, when the Chinese Communist Party
emerged as a force in China, it would also find supporters here.
I would love to see exhibitions on the
identity politics of the Chinese community, including the Peranakans. More
needs to be known about the history of the Straits-born Chinese, beyond their
beaded slippers and other decorative artefacts collected at the Peranakan
Museum at Armenian Street.
The one point on which I agree with Dr Liew is
that Singapore has forgotten many local incidents of historical significance,
such as the Oct 10, 1943 massacre of ordinary Singaporeans by the Japanese.
The heritage museums should dream big and
start a quiet revolution in historical and multicultural awareness.
Clarissa Oon
The Straits TimesBusiness & Investment Opportunities
YourVietnamExpert is a division of Saigon Business Corporation Pte Ltd, Incorporated in Singapore since 1994. As Your Business Companion, we propose a range of services in Consulting, Investment and Management, focusing three main economic sectors: International PR; Healthcare & Wellness;and Tourism & Hospitality. We also propose Higher Education, as a bridge between educational structures and industries, by supporting international programs. Sign up with twitter to get news updates with @SaigonBusinessC. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment